Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thesquanderer

(13,171 posts)
34. Not ordinary according to who?
Sun Sep 30, 2018, 09:08 AM
Sep 2018

She's not "ordinary" in the sense that she positions herself more to the left than most Dems.

Though you could also argue she's more honest than some who have entirely reversed course, in that, whether you want to see it or not, she has always left wiggle room when discussing her future. No "Shermanesque" statement was ever issued, and she surely knew that she could issue such a statement at any time. But she was "typical politician" in avoiding making such a statement even when pressed. As far as I know, she has never actually committed/pledged/promised to serve the full 6 year Senate term if elected.

Typical exchange would go something like this:

Q: What are your thoughts about running for President.
A: I am not running for President. I am running for the Senate.
Q: Are you saying you will not run for President?
A: I am not running for President. I am running for the Senate.

That is, when asked for pin-down clarification on a followup, she would never say Yes or No, she would only repeat what she'd already said. (And tense matters, as Bill Clinton taught us. He was arguably acquitted from impeachment by virtue of pointing out what the meaning of "is" is.)

At any rate, one can be an ordinary politician in some respects, and not others. there's no purity test for ordinary-ness. Some of the anti-Warren stuff reminds me of anti-Sanders stuff. Anything that shows he is not 100% perfect is used to make him seem like a fraud. Whoever it is, we're not going to get 100% perfect, and we don't need it. We need to win. And we need to move left (IMO).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I love her, but she can't win. We need young charismatic like Newsom Pisces Sep 2018 #1
I heard that a lot about Obama KayF Sep 2018 #17
She's no Obama. And I always thought Obama could win. Pisces Sep 2018 #19
The party wanted Obama. murielm99 Sep 2018 #31
I don't like her and she can't win. DrToast Oct 2018 #48
I love Warren. She has heart, brains and down to earth gusto. DemocracyMouse Oct 2018 #51
John Edwards, Part 2? DrToast Oct 2018 #49
Warren: I'll serve my full Senate term if reelected (April 5) brooklynite Sep 2018 #2
She has *always* left wiggle room. thesquanderer Sep 2018 #5
I'm sure voters will appreciate that subtle distinction... brooklynite Sep 2018 #9
The funny thing about your post is you're not joking BeyondGeography Sep 2018 #16
I think it's pretty common KayF Sep 2018 #18
But Warren isn't supposed to be an "ordinary politician". brooklynite Sep 2018 #24
Not ordinary according to who? thesquanderer Sep 2018 #34
I appreciate it. LanternWaste Oct 2018 #45
This was from April. liberalnarb Sep 2018 #7
Actually, I think it's good she said this now... thesquanderer Sep 2018 #44
I like her, but don't know how she'd do against younger, more charismatic candidates in the primary bearsfootball516 Sep 2018 #3
Nevertheless,she persisted. deminks Sep 2018 #4
sometimes, people run but not to win the nomination..... getagrip_already Sep 2018 #6
YES! liberalnarb Sep 2018 #8
No TheCowsCameHome Sep 2018 #10
She is a great senator Dopers_Greed Sep 2018 #11
Warren is a good Senator for us. We worked hard and closely to get her elected. Sadly, FailureToCommunicate Sep 2018 #12
I agree. I am like the work she is doing as my Senator and I would vote for her as Senator again, smirkymonkey Oct 2018 #47
Pretty short-sighted IMO to cross her off because she's currently in the Senate... pecosbob Sep 2018 #13
Please no Rebl2 Sep 2018 #14
No one articulates the progressive vision better than Sen. Warren. Yavin4 Sep 2018 #15
She can campaign for the candidate when the time comes. Pisces Sep 2018 #20
I would support her. PoindexterOglethorpe Sep 2018 #21
Hard pass. BlueStater Sep 2018 #22
Meh. I think it should be Booker or Harris. Luciferous Sep 2018 #23
i would support her. Democratic voters are ready for a real pprogressive candidate INdemo Sep 2018 #25
Democrats will vote for who the Democratic nominee is. Whether she has a good chance of winning the still_one Sep 2018 #27
There are going to be a lot of very go prospective Democratic candidates rpannier Sep 2018 #32
If she runs and wins the nomination, great, but if she doesn't win the nomination, I will be damned still_one Sep 2018 #26
That wont happen. I just said Democratic voters are ready for and will vote for a Progressive INdemo Sep 2018 #38
Put you on ignore for what? I don't even know what your point is. All I a said is no matter who still_one Sep 2018 #39
I don't know INdemo Sep 2018 #43
She'd have my vote. With a lot of enthusiasm. n/t woundedkarma Sep 2018 #28
I love her! mountain grammy Sep 2018 #29
We must stay together on what ever candidate the Dems choose. There's too much at stake. YOHABLO Sep 2018 #30
That should be the main focus still_one Sep 2018 #40
No matter who wins the Democrat primary's and wins duforsure Sep 2018 #33
No more candidates from the blue Northeast or California. djg21 Sep 2018 #35
Hope she runs. BlueWI Sep 2018 #36
This is going to be a mess madville Sep 2018 #37
Clinton is NOT running again. She made it very clear, and frankly all the distortions, lies, and still_one Sep 2018 #41
He will not run. MrsCoffee Oct 2018 #46
Too early to start this: Let's focus on midterms, and registering people to vote. YOHABLO Sep 2018 #42
If so, Elizabeth, embrace it. Pocahontas vs the great white Satan. truthisfreedom Oct 2018 #50
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Warren: I will consider r...»Reply #34