Latest Breaking News

InAbLuEsTaTe

(25,518 posts)

20. Okay, true.. but she accused KKKavanaugh & Judge of arranging "rape trains"

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 12:52 PM

Sep 2018

and, yes, being there when she was raped, so they were aiding and abetting. Okay, so what? That does not justify victim shaming! My point still stands... the fact that she was accused of wrongdoing sometime later as an adult, whether true or not, does not erase the rape lines she saw and her identification of KKKavanaugh as the serial rapist who arranged the assaults of other women, including herself.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Kavanaugh Accuser Faced Own Misconduct Charges [View all] DonViejo Sep 2018 OP

Why the victim shaming? Even if true - which is doubtful - are you saying... InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2018 #1

She never claimed that Kavanaugh or Judge gang raped her, john657 Sep 2018 #18

Okay, true.. but she accused KKKavanaugh & Judge of arranging "rape trains" InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2018 #20

I never said it excused the rape, all I did was correct your wrong john657 Sep 2018 #21

Oh okay, gotcha... just wanted to hammer home the point that it shouldn't matter... InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2018 #37

That's why they were so complacent. Squinch Sep 2018 #2

Finding this hard to believe. n/t rzemanfl Sep 2018 #3

From the source- rzemanfl Sep 2018 #4

Thanks for the info, rz. rec, Nt Mc Mike Sep 2018 #23

Spam deleted by MIR Team TahitiBlue Sep 2018 #27

Not quite accurate there uppityperson Sep 2018 #29

Spam deleted by MIR Team TahitiBlue Sep 2018 #30

Oh. Here's the link I copy pasted from. This definition is widespread. uppityperson Sep 2018 #31

You know if a "company" doesn't like you...................they do go after you, and if someone turbinetree Sep 2018 #5

There is a lot of bullshit around this morning about this woman. rzemanfl Sep 2018 #6

+1 dalton99a Sep 2018 #17

He's also LOST in court. And lost a ton of money because of it. 7962 Sep 2018 #22

Lawyers lose sometimes. rzemanfl Sep 2018 #24

I'm sticking with my prediction on the defamation suit though. Still think it gets tossed. 7962 Sep 2018 #26

Not inclined to argue with you on that. rzemanfl Sep 2018 #28

Oh I'm sure he does. I guess we should know in a month or so maybe? 7962 Sep 2018 #32

Well, getting Drumpf to give up on everything else was probably a pipe dream too. rzemanfl Sep 2018 #33

if this happened, would she have gotten all the clearances? blueniteflower Sep 2018 #7

Clearances for what? LisaL Sep 2018 #10

She worked for the federal govt and had at least secret clearance. DeminPennswoods Sep 2018 #13

Thinking the same thing.... Bayard Sep 2018 #15

Too bad we didn't have cell phones back then. Duppers Sep 2018 #19

This was regarding the false Rhode Island boat rape/beating incident. Earth Bound Misfit Sep 2018 #25

Julie Swetnick is not qualified to be on the Supreme Court, and neither is Kavanaugh louis c Sep 2018 #8

I don't think anybody is questioning whether she is qualified to be on a Supreme Court. LisaL Sep 2018 #12

Anything she has done in the past has no relevance on the accusations louis c Sep 2018 #14

You don't think you credibility would be affected by whatever things you have done? LisaL Sep 2018 #16

Only in a criminal trial, not as a witness in another person's job interview. louis c Sep 2018 #34

So even if you are not believable/credible, that should prevent Mr. Smith from LisaL Sep 2018 #35

No. But his background should be thouroughly investigated in order to be a police officer... louis c Sep 2018 #36

Ergo, Kavanaugh gets to exact political revenge from the supreme court? PSPS Sep 2018 #9

Webtrends has a pretty shitty rating on Glassdoor. Calista241 Sep 2018 #11

Then let's not put her on the Supreme Court either. JohnnyRingo Oct 2018 #38