Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to uppityperson (Reply #29)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why the victim shaming? Even if true - which is doubtful - are you saying... InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2018 #1
She never claimed that Kavanaugh or Judge gang raped her, john657 Sep 2018 #18
Okay, true.. but she accused KKKavanaugh & Judge of arranging "rape trains" InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2018 #20
I never said it excused the rape, all I did was correct your wrong john657 Sep 2018 #21
Oh okay, gotcha... just wanted to hammer home the point that it shouldn't matter... InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2018 #37
That's why they were so complacent. Squinch Sep 2018 #2
Finding this hard to believe. n/t rzemanfl Sep 2018 #3
From the source- rzemanfl Sep 2018 #4
Thanks for the info, rz. rec, Nt Mc Mike Sep 2018 #23
Spam deleted by MIR Team TahitiBlue Sep 2018 #27
Not quite accurate there uppityperson Sep 2018 #29
Spam deleted by MIR Team TahitiBlue Sep 2018 #30
Oh. Here's the link I copy pasted from. This definition is widespread. uppityperson Sep 2018 #31
You know if a "company" doesn't like you...................they do go after you, and if someone turbinetree Sep 2018 #5
There is a lot of bullshit around this morning about this woman. rzemanfl Sep 2018 #6
+1 dalton99a Sep 2018 #17
He's also LOST in court. And lost a ton of money because of it. 7962 Sep 2018 #22
Lawyers lose sometimes. rzemanfl Sep 2018 #24
I'm sticking with my prediction on the defamation suit though. Still think it gets tossed. 7962 Sep 2018 #26
Not inclined to argue with you on that. rzemanfl Sep 2018 #28
Oh I'm sure he does. I guess we should know in a month or so maybe? 7962 Sep 2018 #32
Well, getting Drumpf to give up on everything else was probably a pipe dream too. rzemanfl Sep 2018 #33
if this happened, would she have gotten all the clearances? blueniteflower Sep 2018 #7
Clearances for what? LisaL Sep 2018 #10
She worked for the federal govt and had at least secret clearance. DeminPennswoods Sep 2018 #13
Thinking the same thing.... Bayard Sep 2018 #15
Too bad we didn't have cell phones back then. Duppers Sep 2018 #19
This was regarding the false Rhode Island boat rape/beating incident. Earth Bound Misfit Sep 2018 #25
Julie Swetnick is not qualified to be on the Supreme Court, and neither is Kavanaugh louis c Sep 2018 #8
I don't think anybody is questioning whether she is qualified to be on a Supreme Court. LisaL Sep 2018 #12
Anything she has done in the past has no relevance on the accusations louis c Sep 2018 #14
You don't think you credibility would be affected by whatever things you have done? LisaL Sep 2018 #16
Only in a criminal trial, not as a witness in another person's job interview. louis c Sep 2018 #34
So even if you are not believable/credible, that should prevent Mr. Smith from LisaL Sep 2018 #35
No. But his background should be thouroughly investigated in order to be a police officer... louis c Sep 2018 #36
Ergo, Kavanaugh gets to exact political revenge from the supreme court? PSPS Sep 2018 #9
Webtrends has a pretty shitty rating on Glassdoor. Calista241 Sep 2018 #11
Then let's not put her on the Supreme Court either. JohnnyRingo Oct 2018 #38
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Kavanaugh Accuser Faced O...»Reply #30