Latest Breaking News

Tom Rinaldo

(23,181 posts)

3. A "reasonable prosecutor" would not make that judgemet without a full investigation

Mon Oct 1, 2018, 07:03 AM

Oct 2018

I agree that it might be hard to convict based on the evidence available, but even that is uncertain without being certain that none of the potential witnesses would flip on Kavanaugh after really being grilled. That has not yet happened. The "investigation" to date has merely been a fig leaf.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Outside counsel tells Republican senators 'reasonable prosecutor' would not bring Ford case... [View all] DonViejo Oct 2018 OP

with NO investigation done and other evidence entered, what DA would? This wasn't a trial and beachbum bob Oct 2018 #1

What? Not enough evidence turned up by the non existant investigation? How can that be? Midnight Writer Oct 2018 #2

thats why her statement so idiotic, NOW had an investigation revealed say 7 or 8 girls who had same beachbum bob Oct 2018 #4

And Forget The Polygraph PaulX2 Oct 2018 #31

A "reasonable prosecutor" would not make that judgemet without a full investigation Tom Rinaldo Oct 2018 #3

exactly and why her statement is so foolish. beachbum bob Oct 2018 #5

She is just trying to keep the deposit. I bet the GOP is holding out on full payment... FreepFryer Oct 2018 #6

+1 malthaussen Oct 2018 #15

So says the Judas goat Farmer-Rick Oct 2018 #7

Whether a prosecutor would or wouldn't "bring the Ford case" is entirely irrelevant. Nitram Oct 2018 #8

Exactly. Notably, this Judas goat made no statement on Kavanaugh. Hortensis Oct 2018 #17

Just thinking on this laserhaas Oct 2018 #9

Even if no criminal prsecution I would not HIRE WiseElder Oct 2018 #10

So lady this is what your county in Arizona did turbinetree Oct 2018 #11

+1 dalton99a Oct 2018 #12

Thanks. No surprise. Of course, the standard is not lack of Hortensis Oct 2018 #19

Yepper, spot on................. turbinetree Oct 2018 #21

"Christine," huh? I missed that, but who could keep Hortensis Oct 2018 #22

Yepper, spot on.................and now the country is watching and hearing that supreme turbinetree Oct 2018 #23

Yes. SCOTUS is the #1 issue in a poll cited this morning. Hortensis Oct 2018 #27

Oliver! Great as always! burrowowl Oct 2018 #32

Its always the nuances he finds to sharpen the knives of how create the explain ability turbinetree Oct 2018 #33

Reasonable doubt is enough to dismiss Kavanaugh. Confirmation is not a court case. Diff standard. nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2018 #13

Irrelevant malthaussen Oct 2018 #14

Irrelevant, not quite in the way you are saying. moriah Oct 2018 #29

The question is not if charges could or should be brought but rather should he be cstanleytech Oct 2018 #16

Inconsistencies??? agingdem Oct 2018 #18

The point isn't conviction, the point is his past is proving he's *not qualified* forgotmylogin Oct 2018 #20

This simply pushes Republican frame that it is a trial of Kavanaugh karynnj Oct 2018 #24

Of course not, there was no investigation !! Is she .. STILL .. a prosecutor ?! Crap, feel sorry for uponit7771 Oct 2018 #25

This isn't a criminal prosecution, and even if it was, The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #26

This idiot Mitchell got benched the minute she asked a couple questions Lindsay.... RhodeIslandOne Oct 2018 #28

K&R burrowowl Oct 2018 #30