Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rwsanders

(3,176 posts)
3. Why not? Unless there are no salmon returning to the area, or if that species is extinct you might
Fri Oct 19, 2018, 01:25 AM
Oct 2018

be correct. Otherwise I'm not seeing how restoring habitat would not result in increased salmon.
Unless I'm wildly incorrect, I believe there were more salmon before the dams were built. The issue is that I doubt that the population would rebuild in time to help this resident pod of orcas.
While orcas range world wide, resident pods have not interbred with transient pods in over 100,000 years. They have their own distinct "language" and "culture". Resident pods only eat fish, while transients will attack other whales and other large marine mammals.
Preservation of the resident pods should be given a high priority. How would you approach preservation?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Breaching dams to save No...»Reply #3