Latest Breaking News

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)

48. I doubt most people even understood what this particular case was about

Fri Oct 19, 2018, 10:24 AM

Oct 2018

Incidentally, the motions to dismiss in the contract case have been filed:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.704250/gov.uscourts.cacd.704250.87.0.pdf

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.704250/gov.uscourts.cacd.704250.88.0.pdf

as per:

MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge S. James Otero.The Court indicates that issue before this court is whether there is a case in controversy that remains. The Court sets the following schedule: Defendants shall file a motion to dismiss for lack of subject jurisdiction by 10/8/2018; Opposition shall be due by Friday, 10/26/18; Reply shall be due by Wednesday, 11/07/18. Hearing shall be set for Monday, December 3, 2018 10:00 a.m. In re the Motion to Strike Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Michael Cohen 31 the parties shall follow the same briefing schedule and hearing will be set for Monday, December 3, 2018 10:00 a.m. Court Reporter: Carol Zurborg. (lc) (Entered: 09/25/2018)

The opposition brief next week will be interesting. I'll place my bet after reading that brief.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

62 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge throws out Stormy Daniels's lawsuit against Trump [View all] 7962 Oct 2018 OP

Another pos republican judge. rockfordfile Oct 2018 #1

Do you really like the idea that defending yourself in public can be called "defamation"? MadDAsHell Oct 2018 #28

Time for another Omarosa tape Achilleaze Oct 2018 #2

Whatever happened to her? bearsfootball516 Oct 2018 #6

Trumps Rebl2 Oct 2018 #10

Everybody and their cousin supposedly has a video of Trump doing or saying something nasty Jake Stern Oct 2018 #17

And thats really the only way to look at it. 7962 Oct 2018 #40

She had a book to hawk, so of course she'd say she had "hundreds" Blue_Tires Oct 2018 #42

No, it's time for Mueller. llmart Oct 2018 #7

Counting on a Righty quakerboy Oct 2018 #16

I have a sinking feeling that you are right. llmart Oct 2018 #18

and who appointed that judge? vlyons Oct 2018 #3

Bush in January 2003. n/t OnlinePoker Oct 2018 #19

Read the order. It's a solid ruling fully supported by the law. The judge had to rule this way. PSPS Oct 2018 #4

People here are not interested in the actual law jberryhill Oct 2018 #20

A ruling in favor of someone we dislike is always because the judge is a biased Republican - right? The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #51

Per Avenatti's tweet: spooky3 Oct 2018 #5

And he will lose again....it's his thing...losing. AncientGeezer Oct 2018 #22

What lawyer besides Perry Mason wins every case? spooky3 Oct 2018 #26

You call forcing Cohen's guilty plea and trump named an unindicted... brush Oct 2018 #29

Avenatti didn't force Cohen's guilty plea. The feds were investigating Cohen before The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #60

I know you're one of the anti-Avenattis here but he' the one who bought that case out into the... brush Oct 2018 #62

Mr. Harder apparently doesn't realize... jmowreader Oct 2018 #8

+1 Auggie Oct 2018 #9

He replaced Kennedy with Kavanaugh FBaggins Oct 2018 #12

The "our guy" syndrome. nt 7962 Oct 2018 #14

Judge Otero is an ultra conservative apptd by GW Bush sharedvalues Oct 2018 #11

This seems like good law regardless of the political leanings of the judge. MadDAsHell Oct 2018 #27

Well, get used to it. Ultra-conservative judges' opinions are illegitimate sharedvalues Oct 2018 #43

Stormy needs a new lawyer Azathoth Oct 2018 #13

I agree. I've been saying pretty much the same for some time, but it mostly falls on deaf ears. 7962 Oct 2018 #15

The DVD was cool jberryhill Oct 2018 #21

Yeah, that was back in APRIL I think. Haven't seen it since. 7962 Oct 2018 #23

Didn't you like the info from the ICE whistleblowers? jberryhill Oct 2018 #24

I think its a little of both! 7962 Oct 2018 #25

I know this is probably unpopular here, john657 Oct 2018 #47

Whatever happened to that DVD? The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #52

Are you anti-Avenatti posters forgetting that trump is an unindicted... brush Oct 2018 #30

Not him, Mueller is the man who has brought the real heat re: Cohen. Avenatti is a hanger-on 7962 Oct 2018 #34

Without Avenatti going after trump no one knows about any of it. brush Oct 2018 #39

He does bring attention to it. Mueller isnt going to appear on TV to discuss any of it. 7962 Oct 2018 #41

No, the reason is that the feds were investigating Cohen before the Daniels case The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #53

lol RandiFan1290 Oct 2018 #37

hey, it is what it is. All hat no cattle 7962 Oct 2018 #49

I'm beginning to think she'd have been better off pro se. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #61

A George W. Bush appointed judge Polybius Oct 2018 #31

Judge dismisses Stormy Daniels libel suit against Trump Gothmog Oct 2018 #32

Am sure this isn't over. Doesn't Avenatti get to file an appeal? iluvtennis Oct 2018 #33

He does, and has said he will. And it will also go nowhere. 7962 Oct 2018 #35

If Trump files to have his legal costs covered... MichMan Oct 2018 #36

The Plaintiff, Clifford, is responsible. 7962 Oct 2018 #46

The client is responsible, although the client might also sue the lawyer for malpractice The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #59

It's certainly going to turn the smug even more giddy. LanternWaste Oct 2018 #38

I'm curious as to how many of the posters suggesting the case was dismissed because the judge onenote Oct 2018 #44

Thank u for a refreshing breath of honest objectivity. 7962 Oct 2018 #45

I doubt most people even understood what this particular case was about jberryhill Oct 2018 #48

I just wish I understood what that paragraph meant! 7962 Oct 2018 #50

Oh jberryhill Oct 2018 #54

Thank you for this clear explanation. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #57

Thank you for taking the time to make that so easy to understand!! Much appreciated. 7962 Oct 2018 #58

The responsive brief will be interesting, for sure. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #56

Exactly. The case was a loser from the beginning. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #55