Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
This will be appealed Steven Maurer Oct 2018 #1
This WAS an appeal. Part of the evidence the jury considered was testimony that the company was pnwmom Oct 2018 #2
Thanks for the added info PatSeg Oct 2018 #4
Yeah, I'm sorry, but junk science is still junk science Steven Maurer Oct 2018 #10
Monsanto lost because of their own emails from their own employees. pnwmom Oct 2018 #11
They lost because of scientific illiteracy Steven Maurer Oct 2018 #14
If that happened, that was wrong. But it was also wrong for Monsanto to suppress data pnwmom Oct 2018 #15
I agree with you about Bayer (not Monsanto BTW)... Steven Maurer Oct 2018 #17
Many thought the judge would totally reverse the decision, so I see this as still a win. 7962 Oct 2018 #3
The application of glyphosate makes it possible to forego the use of a number of highly toxic Nitram Oct 2018 #5
There are other options that work as well. Glyphosate is more problematic 7962 Oct 2018 #6
I can't say I've done an exhaustive review of the aviailable literature, but what I've seen is Nitram Oct 2018 #7
And more importantly, the bees. A growing problem. 7962 Oct 2018 #8
True, that. Nitram Oct 2018 #9
NO! Of concern also to first world countries where applicators just dont give a rip - Im currently Kashkakat v.2.0 Oct 2018 #16
from a link in the Guardian article scipan Oct 2018 #12
Thanks for digging deeper! n/t pnwmom Oct 2018 #13
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge upholds verdict tha...»Reply #8