Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 35 years later, Voyager 1 is heading for the stars [View all]neverforget
(9,512 posts)52. I'm jealous!
I would love to go to that!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
just amazing when you consider the way they must control it - with all the old bells & whistles
tomm2thumbs
Sep 2012
#1
Actually, sonny, we used to get up off the couch and turn the dial on the tv set...
rfranklin
Sep 2012
#3
In 1960, we rented a modest shore house in NJ but it had an electric antenna!
rfranklin
Sep 2012
#44
Nuclear-powered. Each has an eight-track tape recorder. And 68 kilobytes of memory.
Auggie
Sep 2012
#5
I dont remember that far back but I think either I had one of these or a friend did. lol
Missycim
Sep 2012
#49
It's not set in an orbit. It won't be coming back unless we somehow retrieved it.
Fearless
Sep 2012
#13
We'll see it again, perhaps. We simply need to master fusion energy and new propulsion drives.
Selatius
Sep 2012
#10
Of course. But engineers always strive to sqeeze the last bit of performance out of everything.
geckosfeet
Sep 2012
#19
sad we never used nuclear pulse propulsion. we could still get to alpha centauri in my lifetime
SWTORFanatic
Sep 2012
#43
I am assuming that New Horizons will eventually overtake the Voyagers...maybe?
roamer65
Sep 2012
#55
That's what can happen when "planned obsolesence" is taken out of the equation
Duer 157099
Sep 2012
#60