Latest Breaking News

Scruffy1

(3,534 posts)

44. Good for her.

Fri Jan 4, 2019, 06:43 PM

Jan 2019

Time for someone to light a fire under the dolts ass. I think its already started, but the leaders don't want to descuss it yet.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

98 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Dems livid after Tlaib vows to 'impeach the motherf--er' [View all] brooklynite Jan 2019 OP

We do not need this distraction right now. I agree with her, but she needs to redstatebluegirl Jan 2019 #1

What is worse is those establishment Dems feigning shock and horror LiberalLovinLug Jan 2019 #48

I prefer "Nazi" underpants Jan 2019 #2

Are you serious? oberliner Jan 2019 #25

Yes underpants Jan 2019 #26

I bet more Democrats would criticize the use of that term in that context oberliner Jan 2019 #27

Nazi is good. Or perhaps a combination of the two? Magoo48 Jan 2019 #42

Ooh yeah underpants Jan 2019 #45

This is silly pearl-clutching. Bilegurken Jan 2019 #3

Muellers investigation however can provide the proper amount of ammo that could force the hand cstanleytech Jan 2019 #5

Agree 100% shanny Jan 2019 #14

exactly! FirstLight Jan 2019 #16

Actually.. LW1977 Jan 2019 #53

+ 1 Chickensoup Jan 2019 #29

Pearl clutching. duhneece Jan 2019 #50

Pearl clutching sharedvalues Jan 2019 #54

Let her stand alone on this one. Hulk Jan 2019 #4

Oh brother. John Fante Jan 2019 #22

It's kinda of amazing how easy Bilegurken Jan 2019 #24

+1 Chickensoup Jan 2019 #31

I stand behind our new crew. "oh brother" is right. Magoo48 Jan 2019 #41

OWM agreeing with you 100% Ferrets are Cool Jan 2019 #52

Crass? akraven Jan 2019 #96

this is being so over played. It's silly. Kurt V. Jan 2019 #6

Yep. The RW is driving another narrative that some Dems are following! TheBlackAdder Jan 2019 #47

Which is exactly why the people voted for change IronLionZion Jan 2019 #7

How Divisive! But then it's Politico shanny Jan 2019 #8

Politico compelled House Democrats to comment as they did? brooklynite Jan 2019 #11

your hopes will be dashed I fear shanny Jan 2019 #17

can't you see he needs his smelling salts? lol questionseverything Jan 2019 #64

yup I can shanny Jan 2019 #84

No but The Politico would like to make this tempest in a teapot "a thing". emulatorloo Jan 2019 #21

RWTP pecosbob Jan 2019 #9

Run with the pack or roll with the punches? nt littlemissmartypants Jan 2019 #71

They don't seem 'livid' to me...a lot like more RWers trying to insert themselves in Dem politics pecosbob Jan 2019 #74

So what does the acronym you used mean? littlemissmartypants Jan 2019 #75

Just that the entire premise that Dems are upset with Tlaib for her statement... pecosbob Jan 2019 #76

Typical for me to make it harder to decipher than it is. nt littlemissmartypants Jan 2019 #80

It's a bad habit I should avoid... pecosbob Jan 2019 #82

Livid? DavidDvorkin Jan 2019 #10

Back off, Democratic faint-of-hearts. Paladin Jan 2019 #12

Read the article. None of them was actually livid. Politico made that up. Then, of course, Squinch Jan 2019 #56

Pelosi didn't seem too "livid" about it... regnaD kciN Jan 2019 #13

People who are applauding this obviously didn't have to play Motherfucker Day BeyondGeography Jan 2019 #15

I don't understand this. Are you saying people really come up to you and asked you these questions? Squinch Jan 2019 #59

Her Democratic colleagues BeyondGeography Jan 2019 #65

Her Democratic colleagues asked her these questions? Where are you getting that? Squinch Jan 2019 #67

They were asked these questions by the media all motherfucking day BeyondGeography Jan 2019 #73

So? Were they unable to answer the questions? Do you think it was a hardship for them? Squinch Jan 2019 #85

They were thrilled BeyondGeography Jan 2019 #88

Seems like a pretty small thing for everyone to get all worked up about. Not like Squinch Jan 2019 #95

Politico loves to promote the "DEMOCRATS IN DISSARY!11!!" narrative emulatorloo Jan 2019 #18

Isn't Politico very RW?!? Blatant attempt to divide dems!! bobbieinok Jan 2019 #19

Yes, they swing right emulatorloo Jan 2019 #23

REPUBLItico Centrist Democrat Jan 2019 #20

Don't think we haven't said something like this in the privacy of our own home; SCRUBDASHRUB Jan 2019 #28

do you think they said the same thing to trump, and how did that work out? juxtaposed Jan 2019 #32

I agree. I got a laugh from it and like her spunk, but it was a bad move overall. Chemisse Jan 2019 #83

Good for her We need a lot more voices that are sick of the b/s. I really like her from what I've juxtaposed Jan 2019 #30

It gave me a little giggle. Squinch Jan 2019 #60

I'm not livid handmade34 Jan 2019 #33

I disagree with some quotes in this article but no one sounds "livid" RandySF Jan 2019 #34

Yeah it is typical Politico hyperbole and clickbait. emulatorloo Jan 2019 #35

Bingo. nt littlemissmartypants Jan 2019 #72

Wussies onetexan Jan 2019 #36

Please do not post horseshit from Politico Maven Jan 2019 #37

She took over John Conyers' district. JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2019 #38

Oh fer Pete's. At ease. mahina Jan 2019 #39

Closet misogyny? WhiteTara Jan 2019 #40

Politico lives for maliciously trying to stir up intraparty feuds Snellius Jan 2019 #43

Good for her. Scruffy1 Jan 2019 #44

There is a time and a place to use profanity. Cold War Spook Jan 2019 #46

I'm a Dem and I'm not livid about what she said. classof56 Jan 2019 #49

Same. mahina Jan 2019 #51

I have, many many times. classof56 Jan 2019 #58

Right? mahina Jan 2019 #69

In my neighborhood, that's his name. mahina Jan 2019 #92

The quoted Democrats don't sound livid at all. Mildly annoyed at the most, saying what they think Squinch Jan 2019 #55

This is bullshit and a waste of time. Anyone who's "furious" or "livid" should focus and Sugar Smack Jan 2019 #57

None of the quoted Dems was actually livid. It's just Politico shit-stirring. As usual. Squinch Jan 2019 #62

Aye, Sugar Smack Jan 2019 #68

I doubt he was a motherf--r Clash City Rocker Jan 2019 #61

I remember here there were some here who had a problem when someone characterized some Trump still_one Jan 2019 #63

Good point. betsuni Jan 2019 #81

Politico doesn't know what "livid" means. Kaleva Jan 2019 #66

I'm not livid but it wasn't very smart to say publicly. OrlandoDem2 Jan 2019 #70

No, Dems aren't. Nancy Pelosi was clear. This is just more divisive bullshit. (n/t) FreepFryer Jan 2019 #77

I have to say it was not helpful... ginny skinny Jan 2019 #78

At the same time, it was no big deal and it would be great if we all stopped walking on Squinch Jan 2019 #87

News flash, women use profanity. Alternative Headline. littlemissmartypants Jan 2019 #79

"livid"? lol shanny Jan 2019 #86

Next up, call him a piece of shit. David__77 Jan 2019 #89

Not Nancy.. she's not. She handled with her Cha Jan 2019 #90

Politico is way off too often. greyl Jan 2019 #91

Dear Dems cagefreesoylentgreen Jan 2019 #93

Perhaps she just did what she promised to do dembotoz Jan 2019 #94

All I can think of is Michelle Obama MissMillie Jan 2019 #97

After a review by forum hosts...locking. Omaha Steve Jan 2019 #98