It works for all of the redacted sections. What complete keystone attorneys!
(See, e.g., Doc. 460 at 5 (After being shown documents, Mr. Manafort conceded that he discussed or may have discussed a Ukraine peace plan with Mr. Kilimnik on more than one occasion); id. at 6 (After being told that Mr. Kilimnik had traveled to Madrid on the same day that Mr. Manafort was in Madrid, Mr. Manafort acknowledged that he and Mr. Kilimnik met while they were both in Madrid)).
In fact, during a proffer meeting held with the Special Counsel on September 11, 2018, Mr. Manafort explained to the Government attorneys and investigators that he would have given the Ukrainian peace plan more thought, had
the issue not been raised during the period he was engaged with work related to the presidential...
The Government has indicated that Mr. Manaforts statements about this payment are inconsistent with
those of others, but the defense has not received any witness statements to support this contention.
The first alleged misstatement identified in the Special Counsels submission
(regarding a text exchange on May 26, 2018) related to a text message from a third-party asking
permission to use Mr. Manaforts name as an introduction in the event the third-party met the
President. This does not constitute outreach by Mr. Manafort to the President. The second
example identified by the Special Counsel is hearsay purportedly offered by an undisclosed third
party and the defense has not been provided with the statement (or any witness statements that
form the basis for alleging intentional falsehoods).
Or if you're totally lazy, just hit select-all, copy, then paste the entire document into your word processing software.