Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mahatmakanejeeves

(68,961 posts)
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 03:44 PM Jan 2019

Judge rules against elderly lesbians rejected from retirement home [View all]

Source: NBC News

Judge rules against elderly lesbians rejected from retirement home

Bev Nance, 68, and Mary Walsh, 72, were denied an apartment in Missouri's Friendship Village because their marriage is not "understood in the Bible."

Jan. 18, 2019, 10:12 AM EST
By Tim Fitzsimons

A federal court on Wednesday ruled against a lesbian couple who brought a lawsuit against a Missouri retirement home that rejected the women's apartment application because their marriage is not "understood in the Bible." ... Bev Nance, 68, and Mary Walsh, 72, married a decade ago in Massachusetts and have been in a committed relationship for roughly 40 years.

When they applied to move into the Friendship Village senior living facility, they did so "because it is in their community, they have friends there, and it offers services that would allow them to stay together there for the rest of their lives," said Julie Wilensky, an attorney representing the couple. ... But once Friendship Village staff found that Nance and Walsh are married, they told the couple that they were not allowed to move in, because the home did not condone homosexuality. The letter they received said that the only married couples they accepted were those in unions between "one man and one woman."

The couple sued, alleging "discrimination on the basis of sex," and their case was finally decided this week by a federal court in Missouri, which found "sexual orientation rather than sex lies at the heart of Plaintiffs' claims." ... LGBTQ groups decried the outcome, and the couple's lawyers said "we disagree with the court's decision, and our clients are considering next steps."
....

Judge Jean C. Hamilton, however, provided a different view of the case's merits. ... "At no time do Plaintiffs assert that had they been men involved in a same-sex relationship or marriage, they would have been admitted as residents in Friendship Village," Hamilton wrote in the court's decision. "Under these circumstances, the Court finds the claims boil down to those of discrimination based on sexual orientation rather than sex alone." ... Hamilton then dismissed the women’s claim, noting that the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers Missouri and other Midwestern states, ruled in 1989 that existing federal civil rights law “does not prohibit discrimination against homosexuals.”

Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/judge-rules-against-elderly-lesbians-rejected-retirement-home-n960211



Hat tip, Joe.My.God:

Court Rules Against Lesbian Couple In Housing Lawsuit Because Their Marriage "Isn't Understood In The Bible"

https://www.joemygod.com/2019/01/court-rules-against-lesbian-couple-in-housing-lawsuit-because-their-marriage-isnt-understood-in-the-bible/
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just FUCK Ferrets are Cool Jan 2019 #1
Horrible. Mrs. Overall Jan 2019 #2
Indeed. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2019 #3
Another example of the bigotry and hatred still in this country...and they have been together for .. SWBTATTReg Jan 2019 #4
WTF? sakabatou Jan 2019 #5
It's a judge correctly applying a horrible law Recursion Jan 2019 #7
The article went on to say (but I had to omit): mahatmakanejeeves Jan 2019 #8
so there is hope of overturing the discrimatory laws. HOPE. riversedge Jan 2019 #9
I agree. But my question would be if the SC decides defacto7 Jan 2019 #16
I think it fairly certain Sgent Jan 2019 #27
Marriage with concubines is"understood in the Bible." keithbvadu2 Jan 2019 #6
Here, this spells it out rather well: volstork Jan 2019 #12
D'ya suppose they kick out folks on their second marriage where the first spouse is still living? keithbvadu2 Jan 2019 #14
Abraham's bro married his niece... Bradical79 Jan 2019 #22
But getting your ass spanked by a porn star with a new born kid at home is ok... Bengus81 Jan 2019 #10
This is unacceptable. First they came for lesbians, then they iluvtennis Jan 2019 #11
Then they came for the 'wrong' kind of Christians. keithbvadu2 Jan 2019 #15
Exactly iluvtennis Jan 2019 #19
What will they say/do when it is not their version of Christianity in charge? keithbvadu2 Jan 2019 #20
But exactly treestar Jan 2019 #36
Nobody "came" for anybody. n/t EX500rider Jan 2019 #18
I won't be going there. I want my time in a retirement home to be interesting, demigoddess Jan 2019 #13
A George W. Bush appointee....................the same Goerge W Bush that murdered over turbinetree Jan 2019 #17
First they came for the lesbians ,then they came for the etc. etc. I feel like I'm in Germany during geretogo Jan 2019 #21
Hardly Germany of the 30s---------that's why virgogal Jan 2019 #28
That's not necessarily possible. A lot of retirement homes discriminate this way. yardwork Jan 2019 #31
The odd thing is that their friends/community are there treestar Jan 2019 #37
Veep's wife works and supports school that discriminates against LGBTQ marehare Jan 2019 #23
Funny that Pence has no qualms about working with/for serial adulterer Trump. keithbvadu2 Jan 2019 #26
Take it higher. this won't stand in a decent federal court. mpcamb Jan 2019 #24
No, don't RhodeIslandOne Jan 2019 #30
Fuck. This. a la izquierda Jan 2019 #25
sharia law by another name. talibornagains. pansypoo53219 Jan 2019 #29
I can't believe anyone is surprised. GulfCoast66 Jan 2019 #32
FWIW, Friendship Villages are owned by a "faith based, not-for-profit" org... WePurrsevere Jan 2019 #33
Appeal worthy. Vinca Jan 2019 #34
In this specific case I think the judge ruled correctly. The LAW must be changed. WhoWoodaKnew Jan 2019 #35
Correct .. sadly n/t Apollyonus Jan 2019 #38
They should sue! zanana1 Jan 2019 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge rules against elder...