Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

volstork

(5,739 posts)

12. Here, this spells it out rather well:

Reply to keithbvadu2 (Reply #6)

Fri Jan 18, 2019, 05:01 PM

Jan 2019

Warning: NSFW

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge rules against elderly lesbians rejected from retirement home [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Jan 2019 OP

Just FUCK Ferrets are Cool Jan 2019 #1

Horrible. Mrs. Overall Jan 2019 #2

Indeed. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2019 #3

Another example of the bigotry and hatred still in this country...and they have been together for .. SWBTATTReg Jan 2019 #4

WTF? sakabatou Jan 2019 #5

It's a judge correctly applying a horrible law Recursion Jan 2019 #7

The article went on to say (but I had to omit): mahatmakanejeeves Jan 2019 #8

so there is hope of overturing the discrimatory laws. HOPE. riversedge Jan 2019 #9

I agree. But my question would be if the SC decides defacto7 Jan 2019 #16

I think it fairly certain Sgent Jan 2019 #27

Marriage with concubines is"understood in the Bible." keithbvadu2 Jan 2019 #6

Here, this spells it out rather well: volstork Jan 2019 #12

D'ya suppose they kick out folks on their second marriage where the first spouse is still living? keithbvadu2 Jan 2019 #14

Abraham's bro married his niece... Bradical79 Jan 2019 #22

But getting your ass spanked by a porn star with a new born kid at home is ok... Bengus81 Jan 2019 #10

This is unacceptable. First they came for lesbians, then they iluvtennis Jan 2019 #11

Then they came for the 'wrong' kind of Christians. keithbvadu2 Jan 2019 #15

Exactly iluvtennis Jan 2019 #19

What will they say/do when it is not their version of Christianity in charge? keithbvadu2 Jan 2019 #20

But exactly treestar Jan 2019 #36

Nobody "came" for anybody. n/t EX500rider Jan 2019 #18

I won't be going there. I want my time in a retirement home to be interesting, demigoddess Jan 2019 #13

A George W. Bush appointee....................the same Goerge W Bush that murdered over turbinetree Jan 2019 #17

First they came for the lesbians ,then they came for the etc. etc. I feel like I'm in Germany during geretogo Jan 2019 #21

Hardly Germany of the 30s---------that's why virgogal Jan 2019 #28

That's not necessarily possible. A lot of retirement homes discriminate this way. yardwork Jan 2019 #31

The odd thing is that their friends/community are there treestar Jan 2019 #37

Veep's wife works and supports school that discriminates against LGBTQ marehare Jan 2019 #23

Funny that Pence has no qualms about working with/for serial adulterer Trump. keithbvadu2 Jan 2019 #26

Take it higher. this won't stand in a decent federal court. mpcamb Jan 2019 #24

No, don't RhodeIslandOne Jan 2019 #30

Fuck. This. a la izquierda Jan 2019 #25

sharia law by another name. talibornagains. pansypoo53219 Jan 2019 #29

I can't believe anyone is surprised. GulfCoast66 Jan 2019 #32

FWIW, Friendship Villages are owned by a "faith based, not-for-profit" org... WePurrsevere Jan 2019 #33

Appeal worthy. Vinca Jan 2019 #34

In this specific case I think the judge ruled correctly. The LAW must be changed. WhoWoodaKnew Jan 2019 #35

Correct .. sadly n/t Apollyonus Jan 2019 #38

They should sue! zanana1 Jan 2019 #39