Latest Breaking News

LiberalLovinLug

(14,568 posts)

30. Yup. They should emphasize instead "Cheaper + covers every citizen from cradle to grave"

Mon Jan 28, 2019, 03:14 PM

Jan 2019

They have to get through the point that paying private monthly insurance payments would be simply replaced by a tax towards a common public insurance. If they could manage to make enough see how money is money no matter how they pay it. The difference is that, averaged out, most Americans would be paying less money that they have earmarked for their medical insurance on a monthly basis. On top of that, the freedom of knowing you and your children will be fine. Will be taken care of no matter what financial struggles the family has in life. No matter what "pre-conditions" they have.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump: Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz doesn't have the 'guts' to run for president [View all] DonViejo Jan 2019 OP

Junior High dare n/t Apollyonus Jan 2019 #1

The best defense against him: Organize a boycott of Starbucks. olegramps Jan 2019 #21

Tomorrow's tweet: "Hey, Schultz, what are you, chicken? Buk buk buk!" Clash City Rocker Jan 2019 #27

This Is Trump Daring Schultz To Run.... global1 Jan 2019 #2

He's NOT a Democrat, he's more like a Libertarian Farmer-Rick Jan 2019 #11

Some Democrats oppose provision of health care to all at no cost to patient. David__77 Jan 2019 #12

Perhaps Farmer-Rick Jan 2019 #15

Yes-it would be tremendously expensive. David__77 Jan 2019 #17

Good point Farmer-Rick Jan 2019 #18

Exactly - When I Advocate For 'Medicare For All' I'm Not Considering That It Is Free Healthcare..... global1 Jan 2019 #20

Yup. They should emphasize instead "Cheaper + covers every citizen from cradle to grave" LiberalLovinLug Jan 2019 #30

And when Medicare is the only payer, they control the costs TexasBushwhacker Jan 2019 #35

I don't think he's a libertarian. Libertarians don't want govt at all. Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #32

Deficits are a bogeyman the RepubliCONS use to keep social programs perpetually underfunded Farmer-Rick Jan 2019 #36

IMO, the deficit IS a huge problem. Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #37

I agree with 90 percent of what you wrote. Farmer-Rick Jan 2019 #38

Yes, it's a symptom. Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #39

Yes, it's not a perfect analogy Farmer-Rick Jan 2019 #40

Thanks! :) nt Honeycombe8 Jan 2019 #41

Exactly Owl Jan 2019 #19

Translation: please, please, please run for President, or I'll lose in a landslide. irresistable Jan 2019 #3

Democrats need to start boycotting Starbucks immediately. Lonestarblue Jan 2019 #4

WELL SAID! CurtEastPoint Jan 2019 #7

He is no longer with the company. BumRushDaShow Jan 2019 #9

He owns 32 million shares of the company marlakay Jan 2019 #22

He still doesn't hold a "managing" position BumRushDaShow Jan 2019 #34

Good point Farmer-Rick Jan 2019 #13

I don't go to Starbucks. notdarkyet Jan 2019 #16

Who asked you, Trumpnuts. C_U_L8R Jan 2019 #5

LOL - Best endorsement that Schultz has gotten! Pachamama Jan 2019 #6

Toddler trump tries to bait Schultz into running. lark Jan 2019 #8

Please explain FreeWheatForever Jan 2019 #10

"Please, Br'er Fox, don't fling me into the brier-patch..." NurseJackie Jan 2019 #14

Spoiler Alert. Snellius Jan 2019 #23

Gad! Maxheader Jan 2019 #24

Yawn... BlueIdaho Jan 2019 #25

If anyone knows about Cowardice atreides1 Jan 2019 #26

Sounds like Trump is trying to goad him into doing it probably with the hopes of weakening cstanleytech Jan 2019 #28

Schultz should immediately vacate any stores in Trump owned buildings. /nt IcyPeas Jan 2019 #29

Oh, Trump REALLY wants him to run! What amazing psychology! Nitram Jan 2019 #31

That is so fucking stupid redstateblues Jan 2019 #33

he double-dog dares you to run! 0rganism Jan 2019 #42