Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
10. Like to think so. But the way the court is being
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 03:02 PM
Feb 2019

stacked suggests an eventual challenge to the "right of privacy" from which we get our "rights" to abortion, contraception, interracial marriage, on-line privacy, even to the decision to have children or not and how many, elective surgery, keep our medical information from employers and gossips, and so much else.

That right to make our own decisions about our private matters is, of course, written nowhere in the constitution. Only "inferred" from various parts. Like the Ninth Amendment, "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

So it's not exactly a rock-solid foundation even to people who believe it's rightly inferred, while others, like Kavanaugh and Gorsuch, do not believe it exists.

Amazing to think states could outlaw birth control right up into the 1960s, when a CT law banning it lead to the seminal case that patched together a rationale for protecting individuals from the state. Even then that first case only made it legal for married couples, though.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court blocks Loui...»Reply #10