Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

cab67

(2,992 posts)

2. This is something I don't always get.

Reply to Jose Garcia (Original post)

Tue Feb 12, 2019, 04:02 PM

Feb 2019

Why does it take so much longer to do things these days?

The transcontinental railroad was completed in 6 years in the 1860's. It was mostly done by hand. I realize high-speed rail isn't the same as the network used for steam locomotives, but still - why would it take 15 or more years to build something a lot shorter than what was built in 6?

Likewise, a lunar mission. It would take a long time to develop the spacecraft, they say. But can't we upgrade the Apollo system that was so successful? They'd obviously need modern computer systems, but it's not as though we've never sent someone to the moon before.

I realize there are good reasons for all of this, but I don't know what they are, so I'm going to be curmudgeonly about it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

GOV. GAVIN NEWSOM CURTAILS PLAN FOR HIGH-SPEED RAIL, PLANS TO ONLY BUILD BETWEEN MERCED AND BAKERSFI [View all] Jose Garcia Feb 2019 OP

:( RandySF Feb 2019 #1

This is something I don't always get. cab67 Feb 2019 #2

I believe it involved a lot of land grading DrToast Feb 2019 #5

Many reasons. Securing property, EPA regs, Higher quality building, water or other obstacles oldsoftie Feb 2019 #26

When we laid the Transcontinental Railway, things were different jmowreader Feb 2019 #32

The writing has been on the wall for a while now DrToast Feb 2019 #3

OFFS. He caved to the right wing bullshit. SunSeeker Feb 2019 #4

Like to see one running from one end of the state to the other end CountAllVotes Feb 2019 #6

Indeed. And one from LA to Vegas. nt SunSeeker Feb 2019 #8

Merced to Bakersfield? How does that compare with LA to SF? defacto7 Feb 2019 #13

If you have to take the bus, it will make the train untenable. SunSeeker Feb 2019 #18

Who the hell wants to go from Merced to Bakersfield? jls4561 Feb 2019 #7

+1,000 !! CountAllVotes Feb 2019 #9

It's the beaches. defacto7 Feb 2019 #14

Exactly, basically a train to nowhere. madville Feb 2019 #16

Let's see... SpankMe Feb 2019 #10

There should be bullet trains from NYC to Chicago, Chicago to Denver, then Denver to SF. roamer65 Feb 2019 #11

No We Can't! jayfish Feb 2019 #12

CONTACT NEWSOM: https://govapps.gov.ca.gov/gov40mail/ diva77 Feb 2019 #15

I just tried his phone, it is still not taking messages. I will email him. SunSeeker Feb 2019 #20

me too. thanks for contacting him diva77 Feb 2019 #22

High Speed Rail could be the solution to CA's skyrocketing housing costs Yavin4 Feb 2019 #17

Very true. And reduce greenhouse gases. nt SunSeeker Feb 2019 #21

It was a bad idea from the very beginning Auggie Feb 2019 #19

can you expand on that thought? thanks diva77 Feb 2019 #23

No, it was a great idea, both for our environment and CA's economy. SunSeeker Feb 2019 #25

Good idea, wrong place. cab67 Feb 2019 #28

We need a bullet train between SF and LA. SunSeeker Feb 2019 #30

Yup. dumbcat Feb 2019 #29

No, it was a great idea. Don't believe the right wing naysayers. SunSeeker Feb 2019 #31

Perhaps he is thinking about universal healthcare instead still_one Feb 2019 #24

They really, really need to punch it up to Lodi so nobody gets stuck there Brother Buzz Feb 2019 #27

Locking... DonViejo Feb 2019 #33