Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,621 posts)
18. I would be.
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 03:33 PM
Feb 2019

It's the kind of thing that makes you radioactive.

If she doesn't say what the investigators want, destruction in order to get the right answers is certainly not off the table.

If you give the right answers, destruction in order to revenge breech of confidentiality is also not off the table. Two people know what's been said, and if you say "A" and the client says "B", you have to turn to Putin and his interpreter for validation.

If Putin backs Trump, it's part of the collusion. If he doesn't, Putin's absolutely trustworthy.

But if you divulge confidential information, you're no longer trustworthy. If you say you don't remember, you're a tool and incompetent.

Interpreters are background.

Remember Carter's Polish interpreter? Somebody off on the side heard his translation and put a spin on it. The spin went far and wide. A later review by experts concluded that he was right and the media were wrong. You had to be paying pretty close attention to details in really obscure news sources to learn that. Why? Because the NYT and WaPo and LAT weren't about to say, "Oh, yeah, we listened to somebody who was wrong and seriously destroyed this one guy's reputation because we were lazy." Plus ça change ... все одно и то же будет.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well if there was any indications on what a lot of sane people saw transpire on the Rose Garden turbinetree Feb 2019 #1
I was hoping for something like this Leith Feb 2019 #2
The only reason for interpreter's notes is to function as an aide de memoire. Igel Feb 2019 #17
I'll bet the interpreter was Melenia denbot Feb 2019 #3
Red Sparrow. DemocracyMouse Feb 2019 #10
Surely the Executive branch can not be allowed to execute foreign policy on their own... PeeJ52 Feb 2019 #4
agree, this was collusion in plain sight onetexan Feb 2019 #6
Aye, Congress has the right and obligation to provide oversight for dealings with other countries. cstanleytech Feb 2019 #8
Will the courts support Trump in the continued expansion of Presidential power? jalan48 Feb 2019 #5
I bet Fuzzpope Feb 2019 #7
I would be. Igel Feb 2019 #18
It's not outside the realm of possibilities Fuzzpope Feb 2019 #20
What if she is a True Believer? LiberalLovinLug Feb 2019 #22
Good point. Fuzzpope Feb 2019 #23
Call him before congress now! Let's hear what he has to say. We have a right to know! ffr Feb 2019 #9
There would have to be people who are working in the White House and the Justice Dept who know that politicaljunkie41910 Feb 2019 #27
My question kwolf68 Feb 2019 #11
Ask a Nazi. Cold War Spook Feb 2019 #12
I bet Putin has tapes of all their meetings. Cold War Spook Feb 2019 #13
That's also been my assumption as well. n/t MBS Feb 2019 #28
Jebus. I do think Mike Pence is getting ready to step into the fat man's shoes!!! marble falls Feb 2019 #14
He'll just lie anyway brandnewday2009 Feb 2019 #15
No notes on the real discussion; here's my take SayItLoud Feb 2019 #16
Unless... Fuzzpope Feb 2019 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author geralmar Feb 2019 #19
dt confiscated interpreter's notes. I don't babylonsister Feb 2019 #24
This is very good news. riversedge Feb 2019 #25
This will produce absolutely nothing. If Putin and trump were going to discuss something Hoyt Feb 2019 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Dems prepare to force Tru...»Reply #18