Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

riversedge

(80,783 posts)
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 10:51 AM Feb 2019

Her husband was not convicted of drugging and raping her - because it is still legal in Minnesota [View all]

Source: Minneapolis Star Tribune




One woman's trauma is pushing state lawmakers to repeal what is known as the marital rape exception.

By Stephen Montemayor Star Tribune
February 22, 2019 — 9:57pm



RENÉE JONES SCHNEIDER – Star Tribune
Jenny Teeson, with her parents Jerry and Terry Teeson, reacted to the unanimous House vote on the bill to outlaw marital rape.


Jenny Teeson learned that she had been drugged and raped more than a year after the assault took place, when she found videos of it on her computer.

She watched in horror as a man forcibly penetrated her motionless body with a sex toy while her toddler son lay sleeping nearby — all documented in a video shot inside their Andover home.

But Teeson’s attacker will never be charged with rape because, until recently, that man was her husband.

“I know why victims give up,” Teeson said in a recent interview. “Nothing on his record says criminal sexual conduct, that he raped me. Nothing says anything to the sex crimes that he did.”

Minnesota is one of about a dozen states that still grant spouses and cohabiting partners exemptions from its sexual assault laws under certain conditions. The state’s “voluntary relationship” statute, which dates to the 1970s, does not exempt spouses from prosecution for forcible rape. But while it is otherwise illegal in Minnesota to engage in sexual penetration with someone who is “mentally impaired, mentally incapacitated, or physically helpless,” that provision does not apply in marriage.......

Read more: http://www.startribune.com/her-husband-was-not-convicted-of-drugging-and-raping-her-because-it-is-still-legal-in-minnesota/506246802/



Have to admit, I did not know these cruel laws were still on the books #metoo
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author littlemissmartypants Feb 2019 #1
Not sure the law is wrong (read my comments), but if he drugged her, isn't that a crime? lostnfound Feb 2019 #2
That isn't the reason these laws exist Major Nikon Feb 2019 #5
Because the husband owns her body. crazytown Feb 2019 #7
Well before then actually Major Nikon Feb 2019 #8
Law is a blunt instrument: mental incapacity laws were once justified as part of eugenics lostnfound Feb 2019 #12
Are you serious? yardwork Feb 2019 #13
I'm talking about the law in general, not this case lostnfound Feb 2019 #14
That's not what we're talking about at all. We're taking about rape. yardwork Feb 2019 #16
No duh. Why did DU get so hostile to discussions of nuance? No duh. Nt lostnfound Feb 2019 #17
You'd have to prove he drugged her. LisaL Feb 2019 #15
How about looking at the definitions of those terms, shall we? moriah Feb 2019 #18
Something discussed in advance lostnfound Feb 2019 #19
I would make sure this story follows him forever. rainin Feb 2019 #3
More here: littlemissmartypants Feb 2019 #4
didn't know this was still legal Lazy Daisy Feb 2019 #6
Another disincentive for marriage. Ilsa Feb 2019 #9
Since his son was nearby how about child porn charges? cstanleytech Feb 2019 #10
Wow. Sickening and shocking that rape is allowed anywhere, let alone in America. SunSeeker Feb 2019 #11
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Her husband was not convi...