Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,607 posts)
2. It's not a constitutional question.
Mon Mar 11, 2019, 05:58 PM
Mar 2019

Strictly speaking, asking for a person's race on the census is "not Constitutional," and there's no authority in the section specifying numeration for taking a census of places like Puerto Rico.

You ask if a person is free (or bound for a term of years) or not free, or in the case of "Indians" if they're taxed or not. If free, then each person counts; if not free, well, that provision's been rendered moot; and if Indian and untaxed, they don't get counted.

Limit the census to just the constitutional provisions and there'd be screaming in the halls of power in DC and lobbyists (both official and unofficial).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»DOJ Asks SCOTUS To Decide...»Reply #2