Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mahatmakanejeeves

(70,548 posts)
Thu Mar 21, 2019, 05:20 PM Mar 2019

Trump signs executive order on free speech on college campuses [View all]

Source: Washington Post

Higher Education
Trump signs executive order on free speech on college campuses

By Susan Svrluga
March 21 at 4:25 PM

President Trump signed an executive order Thursday afternoon protecting freedom of speech on college campuses, surrounded by student activists who have said conservative views are suppressed at universities. ... Trump said he was taking "historic action to defend American students and American values that have been under siege."

More than 100 students joined the president in the East Room for the signing, according to a statement from the White House, along with state legislators, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos. The order directs 12 agencies that make federal grants, in coordination with the Office of Management and Budget, to ensure colleges are complying with the law and their own policies to promote free inquiry and debate. ... It does not tie student-aid money to the order.
....

Susan Svrluga is a reporter covering higher education for The Washington Post's Grade Point blog. Before that, she covered education and local news at The Post. Follow https://twitter.com/SusanSvrluga



Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2019/03/21/trump-expected-sign-executive-order-free-speech/



The article goes on:

Read the full text of the executive order here:

EXECUTIVE ORDER

- - - - - - -

IMPROVING FREE INQUIRY, TRANSPARENCY, AND ACCOUNTABILITY AT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this order is to enhance the quality of postsecondary education by making it more affordable, more transparent, and more accountable. Institutions of higher education (institutions) should be accountable both for student outcomes and for student life on campus.

In particular, my Administration seeks to promote free and open debate on college and university campuses. Free inquiry is an essential feature of our Nation's democracy, and it promotes learning, scientific discovery, and economic prosperity. We must encourage institutions to appropriately account for this bedrock principle in their administration of student life and to avoid creating environments that stifle competing perspectives, thereby potentially impeding beneficial research and undermining learning.


The financial burden of higher education on students and their families is also a national problem that needs immediate attention. Over the past 30 years, college tuition and fees have grown at more than twice the rate of the Consumer Price Index. Rising student loan debt, coupled with low repayment rates, threatens the financial health of both individuals and families as well as of Federal student loan programs. In addition, too many programs of study fail to prepare students for success in today's job market.

The Federal Government can take meaningful steps to address these problems. Selecting an institution and course of study are important decisions for prospective students and significantly affect long-term earnings. Institutions should be transparent about the average earnings and loan repayment rates of former students who received Federal student aid. Additionally, the Federal Government should make this information readily accessible to the public and to prospective students and their families, in particular.

This order will promote greater access to critical information regarding the prices and outcomes of postsecondary education, thereby furthering the goals of the National Council for the American Worker established by Executive Order 13845 of July 19, 2018 (Establishing the President's National Council for the American Worker). Increased information disclosure will help ensure that individuals make educational choices suited to their needs, interests, and circumstances. Access to this information will also increase institutional accountability and encourage institutions to take into account likely future earnings when establishing the cost of their educational programs.


Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the Federal Government to:

(a) encourage institutions to foster environments that promote open, intellectually engaging, and diverse debate, including through compliance with the First Amendment for public institutions and compliance with stated institutional policies regarding freedom of speech for private institutions;

(b) help students (including workers seeking additional training) and their families understand, through better data and career counseling, that not all institutions, degrees, or fields of study provide similar returns on their investment, and consider that their educational decisions should account for the opportunity cost of enrolling in a program;

(c) align the incentives of institutions with those of students and taxpayers to ensure that institutions share the financial risk associated with Federal student loan programs;

(d) help borrowers avoid defaulting on their Federal student loans by educating them about risks, repayment obligations, and repayment options; and

(e) supplement efforts by States and institutions by disseminating information to assist students in completing their degrees faster and at lower cost.

Sec. 3. Improving Free Inquiry on Campus. (a) To advance the policy described in subsection 2(a) of this Order, the heads of covered agencies shall, in coordination with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, take appropriate steps, in a manner consistent with applicable law, including the First Amendment, to ensure institutions that receive Federal research or education grants promote free inquiry, including through compliance with all applicable Federal laws, regulations, and policies.

(b) "Covered agencies" for purposes of this section are the Departments of Defense, the Interior, Agriculture, Commerce, Labor, Health and Human Services, Transportation, Energy, and Education; the Environmental Protection Agency; the National Science Foundation; and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

(c) "Federal research or education grants" for purposes of this section include all funding provided by a covered agency directly to an institution but do not include funding associated with Federal student aid programs that cover tuition, fees, or stipends.

Sec. 4. Improving Transparency and Accountability on Campus. (a) To advance the policy described in subsections 2(b)-(e) of this order, the Secretary of Education (Secretary) shall, to the extent consistent with applicable law:

(i) make available, by January 1, 2020, through the Office of Federal Student Aid, a secure and confidential website and mobile application that informs Federal student loan borrowers of how much they owe, how much their monthly payment will be when they enter repayment, available repayment options, how long each repayment option will take, and how to enroll in the repayment option that best serves their needs;

(ii) expand and update annually the College Scorecard, or any successor, with the following program-level data for each certificate, degree, graduate, and professional program, for former students who received Federal student aid:

(A) estimated median earnings;

(B) median Stafford loan debt;

(C) median Graduate PLUS loan debt (if applicable);

(D) median Parent PLUS loan debt; and

(E) student loan default rate and repayment rate; and

(iii) expand and update annually the College Scorecard, or any successor, with the following institution-level data, providing the aggregate for all certificate, degree, graduate, and professional programs, for former students who received Federal student aid:

(A) student loan default rate and repayment rate;

(B) Graduate PLUS default rate and repayment rate; and

(C) Parent PLUS default rate and repayment rate.

(b) For the purpose of implementing subsection (a)(ii) of this section, the Secretary of the Treasury shall, upon the request of the Secretary, provide in a timely manner appropriate statistical studies and compilations regarding program-level earnings, consistent with section 6108(b) of title 26, United States Code, other applicable laws, and available data regarding programs attended by former students who received Federal student aid.

Sec. 5. Reporting Requirements. (a) By January 1, 2020, the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, shall submit to the President, through the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy, a report identifying and analyzing policy options for sharing the risk associated with Federal student loan debt among the Federal Government, institutions, and other entities.

(b) By January 1, 2020, the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, shall submit to the President, through the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy, policy recommendations for reforming the collections process for Federal student loans in default.

(c) Beginning July 1, 2019, the Secretary shall provide an annual update on the Secretary's progress in implementing the policies set forth in subsections 2(b)-(e) of this order to the National Council for the American Worker at meetings of the Council.

(d) Within 1 year of the date of this order, the Secretary shall compile information about successful State and institutional efforts to promote students' timely and affordable completion of a postsecondary program of study. Based on that information, the Secretary shall publish a compilation of research results that addresses:

(i) how some States and institutions have better facilitated successful transfer of credits and degree completion by transfer students;

(ii) how States and institutions can increase access to dual enrollment programs; and

(iii) other strategies for increasing student success, especially among students at high risk of not completing a postsecondary program of study.

Sec. 6. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
126 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Be careful what you sign executive orders for Chakaconcarne Mar 2019 #1
Yup. I'm expecting invites to go out to Louis Farrakhan shortly. OneBro Mar 2019 #31
I would travel to Liberty University to see an LGBT pride parade there! Initech Mar 2019 #42
I hope this happens ASAP. rainin Mar 2019 #76
Trump To Sign Toothless Executive Order On Campus Free Speech In Bow To Far-Right Student Activists mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2019 #2
My thoughts too. But should it / will it be challenged in court? Sets precedent, challenge or none. Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2019 #7
Screw that, I say we start messing with it. Initech Mar 2019 #10
What an unreadable hairball of words. C_U_L8R Mar 2019 #3
See post #2, spoiler alert: No. DRoseDARs Mar 2019 #6
Satanists at Liberty university? Itchinjim Mar 2019 #4
If they take any federal research funds, hell yeah :-) The Mouth Mar 2019 #14
I hope Louis Farrakhan goes to Liberty University. walkingman Mar 2019 #28
Proud Boys & Identity Evropa is "American Values" EarthFirst Mar 2019 #5
On a university they should be expressed A Former Republican Mar 2019 #18
Can you specify what "can be shown to be Nazi bullshit" means? ehrnst Mar 2019 #46
I did not say rally, I said present their ideas A Former Republican Mar 2019 #60
You didn't specify what form "presenting their ideas" means. ehrnst Mar 2019 #69
I'd make the argument that they should be allowed to speak for one simple reason beyond free speech. Jedi Guy Mar 2019 #121
This is worriesome: NastyRiffraff Mar 2019 #8
yes, and I doubt it would stand on free speech grounds. sfwriter Mar 2019 #21
It's already happening. STEM STEM STEM Politicub Mar 2019 #24
I'm a historian at a major university. a la izquierda Mar 2019 #57
I think immediately, a pro-choice women's group, or another liberal org should start booking talks LiberalLovinLug Mar 2019 #9
Those are generally private universities. Socal31 Mar 2019 #12
What counts is whether they receive federal research money or grants. sinkingfeeling Mar 2019 #38
It addresses private universities separately. Socal31 Mar 2019 #39
'Not enough ewww in the world for this' Gothmog Mar 2019 #11
My freeze peach neckbeards everywhere rejoice. RhodeIslandOne Mar 2019 #13
It may run afoul of state statutes regulating hate speech at state universities. Ford_Prefect Mar 2019 #15
"Hate speech," whatever that is, is Constitutionally protected. mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2019 #51
Several campus situations I am aware of regulate according to intimidation and behavior rather Ford_Prefect Mar 2019 #56
I've been online hate speech is very toxic JonLP24 Mar 2019 #100
There is a difference between teaching the history of hate speech and genocide ehrnst Mar 2019 #111
What I was mainly addressing was "hate speech" JonLP24 Mar 2019 #114
Got it. ehrnst Mar 2019 #117
ALL SPEECH AND IDEAS SHOULD BE ALLOWED IN UNIVERSITIES A Former Republican Mar 2019 #16
So, I should be able to stand in the middle of campus and advocate stuffing Jews into ovens? ZZenith Mar 2019 #19
Yes, say what you will A Former Republican Mar 2019 #33
So you think a university should host a KKK rally to 'test' those ideas ehrnst Mar 2019 #50
It's bigger and more insidious than that. Hard-core right wing Hortensis Mar 2019 #99
After people decide how crazy a person is, what next? rzemanfl Mar 2019 #97
Incitement to riot or fighting words exboyfil Mar 2019 #54
I agree 100%, ideas not actions A Former Republican Mar 2019 #62
Convincing this board that the pie exboyfil Mar 2019 #63
Yes, we no longer believe in talking with each other A Former Republican Mar 2019 #65
Speak for yourself. ehrnst Mar 2019 #67
I said the board in general exboyfil Mar 2019 #68
You said "convincing this board" of which I am posting on. (nt) ehrnst Mar 2019 #70
While I don't agree with him, I at least have some respect for Ben Shapiro. Jedi Guy Mar 2019 #122
By the way, welcome to DU, where attempting to herd cats is not just a figure of speech, it's mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2019 #78
Actions that incite, like yelling "Jews will not replace us" in a march, in unison? ehrnst Mar 2019 #118
Nazis should not be allowed in universities Politicub Mar 2019 #25
And who is to decide what is acceptable and what is not A Former Republican Mar 2019 #35
As a society, we have decided that nazis are unacceptable Politicub Mar 2019 #36
You know not of what you speak. ZZenith Mar 2019 #44
I'm thinking that it's not about 'knowing' about a topic ehrnst Mar 2019 #53
Do you work at a university? A University has the right to choose who speaks at the University, ehrnst Mar 2019 #45
"why should a University give a climate change denier, or other person who devalues science and...." mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2019 #58
Yep, but there are those here who are defending the ideas in it ehrnst Mar 2019 #80
That is just factually incorrect. Socal31 Mar 2019 #61
It's factually correct, and I did read the article. ehrnst Mar 2019 #71
Public Universities host speakers that are not aligned with their politics. Socal31 Mar 2019 #73
I didn't say that they didn't, shouldn't, or couldn't choose to. ehrnst Mar 2019 #75
They are required to, as stated in the EO, which changed nothing. Socal31 Mar 2019 #77
This is the post that you are refuting as non-factual. ehrnst Mar 2019 #82
I'll let the professionals clarify my point. Socal31 Mar 2019 #84
Perhaps this expert might clear up your misunderstanding of what I stated... ehrnst Mar 2019 #85
I have yet to see anyone argue that hate groups can rally. Socal31 Mar 2019 #86
This is a long thread, and you likely haven't read all the posts ehrnst Mar 2019 #87
The university does not have to endorse an idea A Former Republican Mar 2019 #64
Strawman and moving the goalposts.... ehrnst Mar 2019 #66
Absolutism for its own sake is wholly irrational. LanternWaste Mar 2019 #81
This message was self-deleted by its author ehrnst Mar 2019 #52
I GUESS USING ALL CAPS MAKES YOUR INTERPRETATION THE ONLY VALID ONE. ehrnst Mar 2019 #48
I was just shouting the truth as I saw it A Former Republican Mar 2019 #72
So you're not going to answer the question about ehrnst Mar 2019 #74
In answer to your question, you will not like it A Former Republican Mar 2019 #88
So, does that mean yes, you think that universities haven't changed at all since you went to one ehrnst Mar 2019 #89
I do not know if Universities have changed, A Former Republican Mar 2019 #92
The term "freedom" has also undergone a change in the last 50 years, as well as "speech." ehrnst Mar 2019 #94
Now that we are talking we can reach understanding A Former Republican Mar 2019 #95
So let me get this straight: harassment doesn't exist unless the target chooses to be offended? ehrnst Mar 2019 #98
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2019 #101
So you place the responsibility on the target, and not the harrasser. ehrnst Mar 2019 #102
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2019 #106
If it fat jokes didn't affect you negatively, why would you report it as "inappropriate?" ehrnst Mar 2019 #113
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2019 #119
Do you think that Christine Blasey Ford was "choosing" to believe she was being targeted ehrnst Mar 2019 #104
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2019 #107
Words are actions, too. What about leaving pornography on someone's desk? (nt) ehrnst Mar 2019 #108
Do you think that Anita Hill was responsible for continued harassment by Clarence Thomas ehrnst Mar 2019 #105
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2019 #109
What is a WO? ehrnst Mar 2019 #110
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2019 #115
But isn't that supressing "free speech" to report someone when you could just ignore their words? ehrnst Mar 2019 #116
The world will never know! *POOF!* NurseJackie Mar 2019 #123
Hey Welcome to DU A Former Republican 👋 irisblue Mar 2019 #91
Sorry, I will try to be more precise in my tense usage A Former Republican Mar 2019 #93
You were fine with your tense usage - that quote did not imply present tense. bernie59 Mar 2019 #125
I never knew in my all 70 years that one could "volunteer for the draft." rzemanfl Mar 2019 #96
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2019 #103
I cannot help but compare your experience with that of a friend of mine. rzemanfl Mar 2019 #112
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2019 #120
"to enhance the quality of postsecondary education by making it more affordable" DesertRat Mar 2019 #17
All I saw was reporting annually on data to show students how expensive their education will be. n/t Beartracks Mar 2019 #27
This is garbage. First of what if someone tries to go to a Christian college that has accepted cstanleytech Mar 2019 #20
Nothing says anyone has to listen to their bullshit... jmowreader Mar 2019 #22
Just... gross Gothmog Mar 2019 #23
Oh, god. He's smelling her. htuttle Mar 2019 #30
Yes he was-this is so gross Gothmog Mar 2019 #41
Well here's another mess he got the RETHUGS in bluestarone Mar 2019 #26
Looks like we're going to get some Zampolit or Zhengwei on campus htuttle Mar 2019 #29
What about free speech on dairy farms? Sanity Claws Mar 2019 #32
I thought Trump had taken the knife to cut out unnecessary government legislation. Doodley Mar 2019 #34
The takeaway line is this: procon Mar 2019 #37
Yep, along with discouraging those whose parents can't pay tuition in full from enrolling ehrnst Mar 2019 #49
Conservatives should be careful what they wish for. Nitram Mar 2019 #40
Exactly! Don't get mad, get even! Initech Mar 2019 #43
This executive order may not apply to Liberty U. JustABozoOnThisBus Mar 2019 #124
You're right, I meant to write "pro-choice." Nitram Mar 2019 #126
This is a clear attempt to discourage attendance at universities. This is much like ehrnst Mar 2019 #47
should allow liberal speakers at conservative schools unfettered access too.... beachbum bob Mar 2019 #55
Behold the words of Glorious Leader! mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2019 #59
Who gets to decide? underpants Mar 2019 #79
the freedom for violent criminal gangs to recruit on campus DBoon Mar 2019 #83
There is no way that idiot came up with that himself. Sounds like a Stephen Miller, Steve King, GemDigger Mar 2019 #90
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump signs executive ord...