Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Aussie105

(8,116 posts)
2. The problem is?
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 05:03 AM
Mar 2019

From my reading of preliminary analysis, the problem is with the anti-stall feature. Location of the engines more forward on the wings than usual is supposed to give the plane a tendency to go nose up all by itself. Sensors in the tail and software counteract this. Failure of the sensor or the software makes the plane nose dive despite pilot intervention.

Question: where is the 'off' switch for the system?

Why can't a simple 'Siri, turn autopilot off' do the job?

Got to wonder though. What are the 'optional safety features'? Does it include one big OFF switch?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't blame them. Socal31 Mar 2019 #1
The problem is? Aussie105 Mar 2019 #2
See this cvoogt Mar 2019 #12
Wow! 49 jets is a really big order KelleyKramer Mar 2019 #3
And so it begins Sherman A1 Mar 2019 #4
+1 Baitball Blogger Mar 2019 #7
I have to question the decision making at Boeing. Lonestarblue Mar 2019 #5
In their defense, Boeing was just responding Blue_Tires Mar 2019 #10
300+ dead passengers and crew weren't enough to get Boeing's attention .. . hatrack Mar 2019 #6
+1000 Baitball Blogger Mar 2019 #8
All this to up-charge for a few lines of computer code. mackdaddy Mar 2019 #9
Believe it or not, this isn't the first disaster Blue_Tires Mar 2019 #11
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Indonesian airline Garuda...»Reply #2