Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 08:25 AM Mar 2019

Judge tosses Chicago suburb's assault weapons ban [View all]

Source: The Hill


BY MORGAN GSTALTER - 03/23/19 08:05 AM EDT

A judge in Illinois ruled Friday that the Chicago suburb of Deerfield did not have the authority to enact a ban on assault weapons.

Lake County Circuit Court judge Luis Berrones issued a permanent injunction blocking the measure from being enforced, finding that the gun owners who sued have “a clearly ascertainable right to not be subjected to a preempted and unenforceable ordinance,” The Chicago Tribune reported.

Deerfield officials said they are reviewing Berrones’s decision and may consider appealing the ruling to the Illinois Appellate Court, according to the Tribune.

“This unprecedented interpretation of state legislative action and intent make this case ripe for appeal,” village officials said in a statement. “We continue to believe that these weapons have no place in our community and that our common-sense assault weapon regulations are legal and were properly enacted.”

Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/435412-judge-throws-out-illinois-towns-assault-weapons-ban

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They can appeal all they want but due to the 2nd amendment I would not be willing cstanleytech Mar 2019 #1
2A permits AWBs - they are constitutional hack89 Mar 2019 #5
The US had an assault weapons ban from 1994 to 2004. They can be legal bitterross Mar 2019 #9
With the current SCOTUS though I would not give it much hope. No, what we come back to cstanleytech Mar 2019 #14
Correct. Socal31 Mar 2019 #11
+1 n/t Devil Child Mar 2019 #12
Even Scalia was a proponent of gun control tymorial Mar 2019 #26
The hell with the ill.legislature..The people of deerfield know better what they need.. Maxheader Mar 2019 #2
Deerfield's population is 18,000 FBaggins Mar 2019 #3
And you want door-to-door searches to make SURE they're all turned in? oldsoftie Mar 2019 #4
Most ban proponents never go into the details of how they see enforcement of compliance playing out Devil Child Mar 2019 #13
I'm reminded of the "if you're not doing anything wrong, you've nothing to worry about" crowd. oldsoftie Mar 2019 #16
If they have a warrent to search only for guns, I don't particularly care tymorial Mar 2019 #27
So if they arrest someone sarisataka Mar 2019 #34
Well, you dont have to worry because none of thats going to happen. oldsoftie Mar 2019 #42
The ordinance is only sarisataka Mar 2019 #7
Well stated. nt oldsoftie Mar 2019 #15
+1! n/t Devil Child Mar 2019 #17
If it were Fort Worth saying they wouldn't enforce TX marijuana law, would you say the same thing? X_Digger Mar 2019 #29
I hope very sincerely BlueFlorida Mar 2019 #6
So how does NYC do this? Polybius Mar 2019 #8
NY banned assault weapons at the state level. hack89 Mar 2019 #10
New York State didn't ban assault weapons until January 15, 2013 Polybius Mar 2019 #23
You are right. NYC can pass it's own laws hack89 Mar 2019 #30
It's legal to buy and own an assault weapon in NY. Kaleva Mar 2019 #25
That is not an assault weapon. hack89 Mar 2019 #31
Sure it is. It certainly isn't an assault rifle. Kaleva Mar 2019 #33
By however the state defines its ban hack89 Mar 2019 #35
The law doesn't ban assault weapons. It ban certain guns that have certain cosmetic features. Kaleva Mar 2019 #36
Ok. Nt hack89 Mar 2019 #37
And "assault weapon" is just a scary term anyway. ANY weapon illegally used is an "assault weapon" oldsoftie Mar 2019 #43
Have any of these Judges looked at Tombstone or Dodge Historic NY Mar 2019 #18
If the gun owner is left with at least one gun, their 2A rights are intact. nt greyl Mar 2019 #19
Does the same apply to the 1st Amendment? MichMan Mar 2019 #20
It doesn't need to. nt greyl Mar 2019 #21
leave them the gun azureblue Mar 2019 #40
First thing you do is go to all the area gunny stores..where they sell these assault guns.. Maxheader Mar 2019 #22
Illinois, in this case (and probably others) melm00se Mar 2019 #24
Definitely have to protect these folks' gun rights: Hoyt Mar 2019 #28
I am for protecting every bodies rights if i like them or not ymmv nt EX500rider Mar 2019 #32
then who protects the rights azureblue Mar 2019 #38
Well then work to make them illegal if you think that will help. EX500rider Mar 2019 #41
watch what would happen azureblue Mar 2019 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge tosses Chicago subu...