Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sarisataka

(22,710 posts)
34. So if they arrest someone
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 03:46 PM
Mar 2019

For possession of marijuana when they go looking for a gun the owner sold long ago it's all good?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They can appeal all they want but due to the 2nd amendment I would not be willing cstanleytech Mar 2019 #1
2A permits AWBs - they are constitutional hack89 Mar 2019 #5
The US had an assault weapons ban from 1994 to 2004. They can be legal bitterross Mar 2019 #9
With the current SCOTUS though I would not give it much hope. No, what we come back to cstanleytech Mar 2019 #14
Correct. Socal31 Mar 2019 #11
+1 n/t Devil Child Mar 2019 #12
Even Scalia was a proponent of gun control tymorial Mar 2019 #26
The hell with the ill.legislature..The people of deerfield know better what they need.. Maxheader Mar 2019 #2
Deerfield's population is 18,000 FBaggins Mar 2019 #3
And you want door-to-door searches to make SURE they're all turned in? oldsoftie Mar 2019 #4
Most ban proponents never go into the details of how they see enforcement of compliance playing out Devil Child Mar 2019 #13
I'm reminded of the "if you're not doing anything wrong, you've nothing to worry about" crowd. oldsoftie Mar 2019 #16
If they have a warrent to search only for guns, I don't particularly care tymorial Mar 2019 #27
So if they arrest someone sarisataka Mar 2019 #34
Well, you dont have to worry because none of thats going to happen. oldsoftie Mar 2019 #42
The ordinance is only sarisataka Mar 2019 #7
Well stated. nt oldsoftie Mar 2019 #15
+1! n/t Devil Child Mar 2019 #17
If it were Fort Worth saying they wouldn't enforce TX marijuana law, would you say the same thing? X_Digger Mar 2019 #29
I hope very sincerely BlueFlorida Mar 2019 #6
So how does NYC do this? Polybius Mar 2019 #8
NY banned assault weapons at the state level. hack89 Mar 2019 #10
New York State didn't ban assault weapons until January 15, 2013 Polybius Mar 2019 #23
You are right. NYC can pass it's own laws hack89 Mar 2019 #30
It's legal to buy and own an assault weapon in NY. Kaleva Mar 2019 #25
That is not an assault weapon. hack89 Mar 2019 #31
Sure it is. It certainly isn't an assault rifle. Kaleva Mar 2019 #33
By however the state defines its ban hack89 Mar 2019 #35
The law doesn't ban assault weapons. It ban certain guns that have certain cosmetic features. Kaleva Mar 2019 #36
Ok. Nt hack89 Mar 2019 #37
And "assault weapon" is just a scary term anyway. ANY weapon illegally used is an "assault weapon" oldsoftie Mar 2019 #43
Have any of these Judges looked at Tombstone or Dodge Historic NY Mar 2019 #18
If the gun owner is left with at least one gun, their 2A rights are intact. nt greyl Mar 2019 #19
Does the same apply to the 1st Amendment? MichMan Mar 2019 #20
It doesn't need to. nt greyl Mar 2019 #21
leave them the gun azureblue Mar 2019 #40
First thing you do is go to all the area gunny stores..where they sell these assault guns.. Maxheader Mar 2019 #22
Illinois, in this case (and probably others) melm00se Mar 2019 #24
Definitely have to protect these folks' gun rights: Hoyt Mar 2019 #28
I am for protecting every bodies rights if i like them or not ymmv nt EX500rider Mar 2019 #32
then who protects the rights azureblue Mar 2019 #38
Well then work to make them illegal if you think that will help. EX500rider Mar 2019 #41
watch what would happen azureblue Mar 2019 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge tosses Chicago subu...»Reply #34