Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Divided Supreme Court rules against death row inmate with rare condition [View all]FBaggins
(28,706 posts)21. Just like the President could push "the button" right now. He absolutely could
Without Congressional authorization, it would be unconstitutional... but he could still do it.
All nine could declare that Congress is unconstitutional if they wanted to... but it too would still be outside of their Constitutional powers.
The Constitution clearly and unequivocally says that the DP is constitutional... because the 5th Amendment declares that you can't get the death penalty without an indictment by a grand jury. Obviously, if it was unconstitutional, there would be no reason to have that there at all.
So the question for you is why would we even have an amendment process in the constitution if you think that five justices can change it on a whim?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Divided Supreme Court rules against death row inmate with rare condition [View all]
Eugene
Apr 2019
OP
Since it's the law and that's his sentence, it's time for him to pay for his crimes.
Honeycombe8
Apr 2019
#3
I wish you were as sympathetic with the man he murdered, the boy he shot at,
Honeycombe8
Apr 2019
#6
Just like the President could push "the button" right now. He absolutely could
FBaggins
Apr 2019
#21
Undoubtedly you're right. There's no payoff for the ghouls. What would they have to look forward to?
Judi Lynn
Apr 2019
#16
I suspect the Nazi's use of gas has ruined that particular method even though...
EX500rider
Apr 2019
#33
I never realized what dim-wit Gorsuch is. "Choking on blood" is cruel and unusual.
marble falls
Apr 2019
#17
So, is this guy unable to tolerate any IVs at all? Is that what the argument is? That even the
catbyte
Apr 2019
#23
Part of the reasoning for the decision is that they think it's a delay tactic.
Honeycombe8
Apr 2019
#30
you just ain't fucking getting it!!!! this decision is going to affect a lot more ppl than this guy.
Kurt V.
Apr 2019
#32
"What the Eighth Amendment does guarantee is a method of execution that not 'cruel and unusual.'"
cstanleytech
Apr 2019
#31
Wondering what happen to the guy on death row with dementia...now that case was conflicting n/t
Apple Fritter
Apr 2019
#40