Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Pot smokers don't puff away lung health: study [View all]randome
(34,845 posts)75. Mixed results.
"Previous studies have had mixed results," Kertesz explained. "Some have hinted at an increase in lung air flow rates and lung volume (with marijuana smoking), and others have not found that. Others have found hints of harm."
I have no desire to keep you from doing anything you think is helpful to you. All I'm saying is that smoke in itself is NOT good for one's lungs. Maybe something in the pot helps you and more power to you and to research to find out what it is but the idea that inhaling smoke is GOOD for your lungs flies in the face of logic. And like I said, since the science is not indisputable, it's logical to go with one's 'gut feeling'.
Most people would agree that putting smoke into your lungs is BAD for you.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Look for this to get misconstrued by the Pot is Safer Than Water Committee nt
Dreamer Tatum
Jan 2012
#2
Yes, everyone knows drawing unfiltered smoke into the lungs cannot possibly do any harm.
Dreamer Tatum
Jan 2012
#6
Instead of the idiotic request to have everyone here prove a negative, why don't you prove
EOTE
Jan 2012
#63
How can anyone possibly believe that breathing in smoke is good for your health?
randome
Jan 2012
#64
So these "mixed results" you're referring to is a person saying "Others have found hints of harm."
EOTE
Jan 2012
#76
calling anything "non-toxic" is like a giant blinking red light to anyone who knows what toxic means
enki23
Jan 2012
#44
If it ever kills someone I'll take it back. It is a fact that Cannabis is non-toxic.
tridim
Jan 2012
#46
Weed is safer than a lot of water in this country, which says more about the water than the weed.
McCamy Taylor
Jan 2012
#17
are they anything like the "i got nothing so let me pull my opinion outta my ass" committee?
frylock
Jan 2012
#30
Maybe it's all that weed I've smoked, but it seems half your posts are imaginary arguments no one
Guy Whitey Corngood
Jan 2012
#78
It is far past time that we legalize it and at the very least put that part of the stupid drug war
slay
Jan 2012
#14
Oh, are you saying that smoking doesn't occur in nature isn't a scientific fact?
caseymoz
Jan 2012
#91
Oh, and it looks like marijuana, even smoked, IS an effective treatment for asthma.
EOTE
Jan 2012
#93
All the available information suggests that marijuana alleviates the symptoms of asthma
EOTE
Jan 2012
#96
Please repost this, with the vid, in the Drug Policy forum as a stand-alone post
RainDog
Jan 2012
#85
Vaporizing the substance removes the toxins, period. As does eating the wonderful brownies.
byronius
Jan 2012
#49
It is becoming increasingly difficult to justify leaving pot possession illegal.
totodeinhere
Jan 2012
#50
Doesnt damage lungs, doesnt impair motor skills, isnt addictive, dozens of legitimate medical uses
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2012
#68
I'm not someone that every wants to use drugs or support them personally..
Corruption Winz
Jan 2012
#80