Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jedi Guy

(3,185 posts)
15. "An overdose is a personal choice of the user not of the salesperson."
Tue Jul 9, 2019, 07:52 PM
Jul 2019

That's hardly always the case. For illicit drugs, they can be (and frequently are) cut with other substances in order to make more money. Sometimes those substances are benign and sometimes they spectacularly lethal. The user has no real way of knowing, and the dealer may not know either. That's one of the problems with illicit drugs, unfortunately.

With prescription pharmaceuticals, there are such things as accidental overdoses, as well. I once had a time-release pain medication that hit me all at once, most likely because the sealant on the tablet was cracked in a way that wasn't obvious. Instead of getting the medication over 8 hours, I got it in one shot. I was very fortunate that it didn't kill me, particularly since I lived alone at the time. As it was, I more or less grayed out for a few hours and my memory of that night has big gaps in it.

I definitely wouldn't characterize an overdose as a "personal choice" unless the person in question is suicidal or they're taking overlarge doses in order to get high.

Insofar as the "War on Drugs" is concerned, it's been a spectacular success for the private prison industry, among others. For the general public, not so much. For-profit prisons need to go, and America should consider what we're doing wrong, given the recidivism rates of some European countries. Our justice system has always been focused more on punishment than redemption/rehabilitation, though.

Think involuntary manslaughter might be enough. NT emmaverybo Jul 2019 #1
It should be ck4829 Jul 2019 #25
'...prove malice, a high standard...' Cirque du So-What Jul 2019 #2
There are.more than a few ronatchig Jul 2019 #9
Of course this law will only be used on blacks. Stonepounder Jul 2019 #19
I agree that this is exactly how this law will be applied. nocoincidences Jul 2019 #26
I'm okay with this Marengo Jul 2019 #3
If they do this, they should apply this with all product liability deaths ArizonaLib Jul 2019 #10
I'm sure they are drafting a similar bill dvan Jul 2019 #4
Bingo! keithbvadu2 Jul 2019 #6
Yes, it's a product liability issue bucolic_frolic Jul 2019 #7
I'm as much of a 'gun fetishist' as anyone The Mouth Jul 2019 #8
Remove "without a background check" 3Hotdogs Jul 2019 #17
If the dealer does a background check Everyman Jackal Jul 2019 #18
what it, 35,000 people get killed each year by guns. 3Hotdogs Jul 2019 #20
So change the Constitution. Everyman Jackal Jul 2019 #21
Or a doctor that prescribes a narcotic for someone that overdoses not to mention pharmacists. cstanleytech Jul 2019 #12
So, the Sackler Family are "good samaritans"? Mazeltov Cocktail Jul 2019 #5
White collar people are safe Midnightwalk Jul 2019 #11
Amen to that The Liberal Lion Jul 2019 #14
An overdose is a personal choice of the user not of the salesperson. The Liberal Lion Jul 2019 #13
"An overdose is a personal choice of the user not of the salesperson." Jedi Guy Jul 2019 #15
You will of course, support that conclusion with objective evidence, yes? LanternWaste Jul 2019 #22
Goddamn, Goddamn the Pusher jpak Jul 2019 #16
Kick ck4829 Jul 2019 #23
That last paragraph though ck4829 Jul 2019 #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New North Carolina law al...»Reply #15