Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)DOJ Says Ruling on Indefinite Detention Law Is ‘Unprecedented’ [View all]
Source: WSJ Law Blog
September 14, 2012, 2:47 PM
By Joe Palazzolo
The Obama administration, stung by a court ruling striking down a law on indefinite detention, had some strong words Friday for the federal district judge who issued it. In a court filing requesting that the judge suspend the ruling pending appeal, Justice Department lawyers wrote:
- This Courts decision is unprecedented, and the government has compelling arguments that it should be reversed. The decision holds facially unconstitutional an Act of Congress that was passed to confirm the authority of the President as Commander in Chief under the Authorization for Use of Military Force in connection with ongoing military operations against al-Qaeda and its affiliatesa setting in which the Judiciary owes the greatest deference to the other branchesand in doing so it disregards the interpretation of the Presidents detention authority by two Presidents, the D.C. Circuit, and the Congress itself.
Judge Katherine B. Forrest of the Southern District of New York, an Obama appointee, said in a ruling on Wednesday that the law impinges on First Amendment rights and violates due process. The law, passed as part of the National Defense Authorization Act, permits the U.S. government to detain indefinitely people who are part of or substantially support Al Qaeda, the Taliban or associated forces engaged in hostilities against the U.S.
The U.S. government has argued that new law reasserts powers already provided by Congress in the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force against perpetrators of the Sept. 11 attacks and those who helped them. Judge Forrest said the new measure was broader, because it covered people beyond those connected to the 9/11 attacks.
Read more: http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2012/09/14/doj-says-ruling-on-indefinite-detention-law-is-unprecedented/
****Update**** 4:31 p.m. Judge Forrest denied the Justice Departments request for an interim stay.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think the "constitutional scholar", and his AJ, are well aware of the fact, and intend to use
leveymg
Sep 2012
#29
Lyndon Johnson's Vietnam. Very, very bad things happen under otherwise fairly good Presidents.
leveymg
Sep 2012
#30
What good is a Constitution if the Powers-That-Be keep making exceptions to it to suit themselves?
RC
Sep 2012
#5
Looks like the current admin is trying to get this to the SCOTUS as soon as possible.
rhett o rick
Sep 2012
#11
So is an indefinite detention law. Lincoln's suspension of habeus was by Presidential Order, the
leveymg
Sep 2012
#26
Korematsu didn't rule on the indefinite detention part, just the exclusion zone.
leveymg
Sep 2012
#28
The Court used two judicial principles to avoid ruling on the indefinite detention.
OnyxCollie
Sep 2012
#31
What's unprecedented is the Justice Dept. claiming the President has autocratic power. nt
bemildred
Sep 2012
#35
And I was referring to the Justice Dept. claim, like in the subject line of the OP.
bemildred
Sep 2012
#43