Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: DOJ Says Ruling on Indefinite Detention Law Is ‘Unprecedented’ [View all]OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)31. The Court used two judicial principles to avoid ruling on the indefinite detention.
First, they chose to rule on what was before them, but instead of ruling on the detention (and providing a remedy for the interned) they ruled on the ability of the executive to successfully wage war. Second, they avoided the political question of waging war by deferring to the executive.
Justice Douglas wanted to provide an opportunity for the Japanese to prove their loyalty, but pressure by Chief Justice Stone resulted in him conforming to the majority.
See my post (#14) for more info.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think the "constitutional scholar", and his AJ, are well aware of the fact, and intend to use
leveymg
Sep 2012
#29
Lyndon Johnson's Vietnam. Very, very bad things happen under otherwise fairly good Presidents.
leveymg
Sep 2012
#30
What good is a Constitution if the Powers-That-Be keep making exceptions to it to suit themselves?
RC
Sep 2012
#5
Looks like the current admin is trying to get this to the SCOTUS as soon as possible.
rhett o rick
Sep 2012
#11
So is an indefinite detention law. Lincoln's suspension of habeus was by Presidential Order, the
leveymg
Sep 2012
#26
Korematsu didn't rule on the indefinite detention part, just the exclusion zone.
leveymg
Sep 2012
#28
The Court used two judicial principles to avoid ruling on the indefinite detention.
OnyxCollie
Sep 2012
#31
What's unprecedented is the Justice Dept. claiming the President has autocratic power. nt
bemildred
Sep 2012
#35
And I was referring to the Justice Dept. claim, like in the subject line of the OP.
bemildred
Sep 2012
#43