Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

former9thward

(33,424 posts)

11. The original case was before one federal judge in San Francisco.

Reply to Freethinker65 (Reply #8)

Wed Sep 11, 2019, 07:13 PM

Sep 2019

His attempts to create a nationwide injunction were rejected by the 9th circuit. Lawyers only filed where they thought they would get a favorable ruling. If they had filed everywhere there would have been split rulings for and against. The fact that the SC is letting the process go forward while the case is litigated means they will probably favor the administration when it gets to the SC.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court says Trump administration can begin denying migrants asylum at southern border [View all] BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 OP

WHILE LEGAL FIGHT CONTINUES... Lifts an injunction but the issue is not settled. hlthe2b Sep 2019 #1

UNBELIEVABLE!! bluestarone Sep 2019 #5

Can't we engage other countries barbtries Sep 2019 #2

Two illegitimate Supreme Court nominations are now swaying the court to the right Optical.Catalyst Sep 2019 #3

The vote was 7-2 former9thward Sep 2019 #9

yup, only RBG and Sotomeyer dissenting Amishman Sep 2019 #12

If we had our two nominees, it would have been 4-4 with a swing vote Optical.Catalyst Sep 2019 #14

Who knows what it would have been? former9thward Sep 2019 #15

Who's our two nominees? Drunken Irishman Sep 2019 #17

Let's assume Kennedy still retires Polybius Sep 2019 #20

Is this in accord with intl law? Karadeniz Sep 2019 #4

international law only applies if we signed a binding treaty, which we usually don't do Amishman Sep 2019 #10

Looks like it was a 7-2 decision MichMan Sep 2019 #6

I wonder if the timing is significant. pintobean Sep 2019 #7

Sounds like the circuit court was ruling for border areas outside of its jurisdiction. Freethinker65 Sep 2019 #8

The original case was before one federal judge in San Francisco. former9thward Sep 2019 #11

"Who knows what it will be?" LanternWaste Sep 2019 #19

When Trump celebrates does order a round of White Russians? ArizonaLib Sep 2019 #13

With Trump vodka lordsummerisle Sep 2019 #16

Breyer and Kagan have sided what the conservatives a few times this year Polybius Sep 2019 #18

Sotomayor Pens Powerful Dissent Democrats_win Sep 2019 #21

keeping his base happy IcyPeas Sep 2019 #22

Breyer and Kagan voted with the conservatives Polybius Sep 2019 #23