Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Ohio parents plead guilty in son's cancer death [View all]azurnoir
(45,850 posts)29. but if that is true how was it that social services was involved for at least 6 months
without that happening?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Like something out of Dickens. People jailed because they didn't have health insurance.
yardwork
Jan 2012
#1
Not saying let the kids die, nor saying these parents aren't at least partial guilty
evilkumquat
Jan 2012
#15
If they thought he had swollen glands, they would not take him to the emergency room.
JDPriestly
Jan 2012
#11
They were jailed because they criminally neglected their children--see post 6 below.nt
msanthrope
Jan 2012
#8
Six kids, none in school--moved to avoid Child Protective Services--see post 6.
msanthrope
Jan 2012
#7
the washington post article said that their social worker told them not to get the lump
Tunkamerica
Jan 2012
#25
The same article says that social services had been involved since July of 2007
azurnoir
Jan 2012
#26
but if that is true how was it that social services was involved for at least 6 months
azurnoir
Jan 2012
#29
That is NOT my experience with my State's Children, Youth and Families (CYF).
happyslug
Jan 2012
#40