Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to Kablooie (Original post)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

the 18 minutes of blank tape nt msongs Sep 2019 #1
Yup, it's Watergate all over again... tRump's goose is cooked!! InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2019 #33
Since when are criminals allowed to provide redacted evidence democratisphere Sep 2019 #2
Really! Newest Reality Sep 2019 #5
They'll make a "Mad-lib" word salad out of it. calimary Sep 2019 #32
Time for negotiations must be over, time for democrats to do their duty beachbumbob Sep 2019 #3
I think they'll come through this time with Nancy now out in front supporting a impeachment inquiry. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2019 #34
I think she was forced into this position and still wonder why no accoutnabilty has been beachbumbob Sep 2019 #37
Oh, it's comin... no way the Democrats blow this golden opportunity to be rid of that POS. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2019 #38
highly unlikey he will be "rid of" except for not being re-elected beachbumbob Sep 2019 #40
Senate repubs will impeach orangecrush Sep 2019 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2019 #4
What the HELL are they hiding? Scarsdale Sep 2019 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2019 #28
It does make you wonder. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2019 #35
NO REDACTIONS! Remember Watergate tapes redactions? NO WAY THIS IS OKAY! tableturner Sep 2019 #6
This may be a dumb question, but... silverweb Sep 2019 #7
Read on Lawfare a few days ago canetoad Sep 2019 #17
Clarification appreciated. silverweb Sep 2019 #18
Reported last night: Whistle blower lawyer wrote to Acting DNI asking for that guidance. CincyDem Sep 2019 #27
Good to know. silverweb Sep 2019 #30
Yes, do it all by the book, but.... DrToast Sep 2019 #21
YESSSSS!!! InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2019 #39
Fuck this shit bluestarone Sep 2019 #8
No. No deals. Criminals do not select the evidence. bucolic_frolic Sep 2019 #9
+1 K&R onetexan Sep 2019 #44
playing the redacted game again. nt yaesu Sep 2019 #10
Back tracking already. sinkingfeeling Sep 2019 #11
They already said they would not convict him in the Senate so I doubt that he is spooked over that. cstanleytech Sep 2019 #12
By backing him, the gop Scarsdale Sep 2019 #26
One can hope it paves the way for that. calimary Sep 2019 #41
The "transcript' will not be a verbatim recording of the words spoken by both sides. erronis Sep 2019 #13
Heh heh heh. truthisfreedom Sep 2019 #14
Deal?!? The Liberal Lion Sep 2019 #15
Consider the Source.... LovingA2andMI Sep 2019 #16
No. No. And NO. NO TERMS ON ANYTHING FROM THE WH. (not yelling, just EMphasizing) ancianita Sep 2019 #19
F U C K T H A T! nt Guy Whitey Corngood Sep 2019 #20
They don't dictate anything about a "whistle blower deal", that's the point behind the WB law!!! George II Sep 2019 #22
No, Trump, you get no deal. You get nothing! You LOSE! SunSeeker Sep 2019 #23
JUST SAY NO! regnaD kciN Sep 2019 #24
Since when is a credible and serious complaint turned over to the person that the complaint is about Farmer-Rick Sep 2019 #29
A plea deal? If Trump and Pence admit guilt, they won't get prosecuted after resigning? muriel_volestrangler Sep 2019 #31
Fuck with the deals... turn over the evidence or just add an obstruction charge InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2019 #36
A DEAL? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? LiberalLovinLug Sep 2019 #43
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House Seeks Deal fo...»Reply #4