Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Optical.Catalyst

(1,355 posts)

23. Here we go; things are happing now.

Reply to crazytown (Original post)

Wed Sep 25, 2019, 05:27 PM

Sep 2019

After Congress forces AG Barr to recuse, we will get the appointment of a Special Council to investigate the Trump / Ukraine connection. Perhaps this time around, the SC will have Trump under oath before a Grand Jury.

We hold the evidence this time, and Trump is going to be charged.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

House Judiciary Chairman calls on the Attorney General to Recuse Himself [View all] crazytown Sep 2019 OP

Nadler is shrewd, and ouch that hits Barr hard bucolic_frolic Sep 2019 #1

Barr is a crook, he will not recuse himself, he is up to his eyebrows on all this Perseus Sep 2019 #7

question is if LowBarr doesn't recuse himself, which is most likely not, what the Judiciary can do onetexan Sep 2019 #11

He can be impeached? 2naSalit Sep 2019 #28

Then let him go to prison. volstork Sep 2019 #12

He wouldn't be the first! Grins Sep 2019 #21

Rules are for losers. CrispyQ Sep 2019 #13

You may be right. Some research would suggest an insideous long game has had some success. steventh Sep 2019 #20

And... the VP also is involved and should Farmer-Rick Sep 2019 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author George II Sep 2019 #4

And while we're at it, sworn testimony to Congress might be helpful bucolic_frolic Sep 2019 #3

And now we know the definitive answer Sogo Sep 2019 #18

yeah, there was just something hesitant in his answer bucolic_frolic Sep 2019 #19

What the Wh released is NOT a transcript. pangaia Sep 2019 #5

I learned yesterday SCVDem Sep 2019 #9

Aren't there comm or intel systems that pick up these conversations? AT&T or NSA, (per Snowen)? ancianita Sep 2019 #17

Exactly!! It's is not a verbatim transcript of the recording. Pepsidog Sep 2019 #16

Yeah, like trump speaks like that? moonseller66 Sep 2019 #6

And by Barr, we mean Barr, not Mike Pence, as today's BS transcript substitutes. ffr Sep 2019 #8

If only he would impeach himself FakeNoose Sep 2019 #10

Actually democrats should announce impeachment inquiry into Barr, they beachbumbob Sep 2019 #14

K & R Duppers Sep 2019 #15

Save yourself some time and embarrassment, Barr. SergeStorms Sep 2019 #22

Here we go; things are happing now. Optical.Catalyst Sep 2019 #23

That's like asking Jabba the Hutt to be nice. dchill Sep 2019 #24

K&R ck4829 Sep 2019 #25

Recurse? Aussie105 Sep 2019 #26

Barr should be disbarred! Linda Ed Sep 2019 #27