Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
10. That doesn't make sense
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 07:49 PM
Sep 2012

If the people affected are making up to $50,000/year that means they are employed somehow. The unemployed are not affected by this tax because they would receive an exemption due to financial hardship, right? I don't see how improved employment numbers lower the 6,000,000 person estimate. Anyway, I don't see the article as an anti-Obama hit piece. It provides statements from both sides, points out that it is based on Republican legislation, talks about financial incentives for lower and middle income families to balance out the penalty, most of those being penalized doing it out of choice and so on. I thought the article was pretty fair.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pure scare tactics. silverweb Sep 2012 #1
Let's get this straight: You say the CBO is "intending to frighten people and smear the President"?? brentspeak Sep 2012 #2
No. silverweb Sep 2012 #5
I agree about the headline, but not the content of the article. Bradical79 Sep 2012 #11
Since it's the CBO analysts who have announced new, revised projections on this brentspeak Sep 2012 #18
In contrast to the CBO projections being used to frighten and smear in favor of Obama thetonka Sep 2012 #33
That doesn't make sense Bradical79 Sep 2012 #10
we cant cite the cbo when it backs our opinions then blow it off when it doesnt - save that for the leftyohiolib Sep 2012 #3
Of course we can, just like when we watch Joey Scar on Mourning Schmoe so we can complain here on DU winstars Sep 2012 #8
Pure "agenda" piece PSPS Sep 2012 #4
Exactly. silverweb Sep 2012 #6
Your comment is so representative of one of DU's great strengths... FailureToCommunicate Sep 2012 #20
You're too kind. silverweb Sep 2012 #28
Not to worry Mnpaul Sep 2012 #7
I found the art. on abcnews.com. The law doesn't affect those who can't afford it. Honeycombe8 Sep 2012 #9
"Medicaid has been expanded under the reform act" brentspeak Sep 2012 #15
The federal govt subsidizes, when a person can't get Medicaid. Honeycombe8 Sep 2012 #17
Read the article and the graphs again, please brentspeak Sep 2012 #19
I admit I didn't pay much attention, because I knew already... Honeycombe8 Sep 2012 #24
Did you even read the article you posted? Moosepoop Sep 2012 #22
Did you read my response? brentspeak Sep 2012 #26
What promise is broken? spedtr90 Sep 2012 #12
Roughly how many middle-class and low-income households will receive subsidies? brentspeak Sep 2012 #16
Here you go. Moosepoop Sep 2012 #23
Nope, the answers to my questions are not in the link you provided brentspeak Sep 2012 #25
This is based on current conditions railsback Sep 2012 #13
President Obama is not raising the taxes for six million people GreydeeThos Sep 2012 #14
Limits, limits, and more limits to tax penalty enforcement... Blue Idaho Sep 2012 #21
So buy insurance. Zoeisright Sep 2012 #27
They might not be able to afford it... davidn3600 Sep 2012 #30
So I'm unemployed (over a year and counting) living with my mother jbgood1977 Sep 2012 #29
This is simple fairness........... SILVER__FOX52 Sep 2012 #31
Right, around 2% of the population. MrSlayer Sep 2012 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Tax penalty to hit nearly...»Reply #10