Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Grins

(9,465 posts)
18. Republican lawyers making s**t up.
Tue Nov 5, 2019, 02:00 PM
Nov 2019

"Executive privilege" has always been a negotiation.
"Executive privilege" did not exist as a point of law until Republican lawyers in Nixon's Justice Dept. made it up.
To defend a Republican crook.
Nixon's Republican lawyers asserted executive privilege to keep secret the Oval Office tapes.
The Supreme Court killed that saying the "fundamental demands of due process of law in the fair administration of criminal justice".
The Supreme Court said executive privilege - cannot be used to cover up wrongdoing.
That view was endorsed by current U.S. Attorney General William Barr during his Senate confirmation hearing.
Barr: "If it turns out that any report contains material information that is privileged or confidential, I would not tolerate an effort to withhold such information for any improper purpose, such as to cover up wrongdoing."
When Clinton asserted executive privilege re: Monica Lewinsky - he lost in Court.
When Obama asserted the privilege re: "Fast and Furious" - he lost in Court.
And here we are, another Republican lawyer with "the most transparent administration ever", invoking a "privilege".
To cover for another Republican crook.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

? wryter2000 Nov 2019 #1
Great question! Mike 03 Nov 2019 #4
I would think wryter2000 Nov 2019 #6
Trump's "constitutional power to screen privileged information from lawmakers" Mike 03 Nov 2019 #2
in impeachment, absolutely not. the rules are what nancy sez they are. mopinko Nov 2019 #10
SCOTUS already ruled on that during Nixon. No privilege to cover up crimes. lagomorph777 Nov 2019 #26
Does this override the rules set down by the House last week? underpants Nov 2019 #3
THIS! bluestarone Nov 2019 #7
The DOJ seems to be interfering with an investigation sakabatou Nov 2019 #5
Totally agree! Juneboarder Nov 2019 #8
In the long run it can't be and hopefully in the long run those responsible like Barr cstanleytech Nov 2019 #17
Barr is setting himself up for impeachment. lagomorph777 Nov 2019 #27
Trump & Barr & DOJ are inventing powers as time moves along bucolic_frolic Nov 2019 #9
LOL @ trying to get the whistleblower details via this BS? Brainfodder Nov 2019 #11
This will definitely be ignored. The DOJ/executive branch has no power Re: an impeachment process. tableturner Nov 2019 #12
Not necessarily onenote Nov 2019 #19
They don't have to let a DOJ attorney accompany witnesses & force witnesses to listen to them... tableturner Nov 2019 #22
And dis-barr barr, and throw him in jail too. Lock him up. Nov 2019 #13
The attorney general and the DOJ have historically been involved in reviewing and supporting onenote Nov 2019 #20
Somebody is trying to please Corgigal Nov 2019 #14
Nixon did his....... MyOwnPeace Nov 2019 #15
I would assume the witness would also have their own lawyer present. patphil Nov 2019 #16
Republican lawyers making s**t up. Grins Nov 2019 #18
Executive privilege existed and was recognized by the courts long before Nixon onenote Nov 2019 #21
They see how the courts have been ruling lately Bayard Nov 2019 #23
Barr knows he's going down with them. This is the last gasp. nt crickets Nov 2019 #24
There is no basis for this in the Constitution... malthaussen Nov 2019 #25
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»DOJ places new legal barr...»Reply #18