Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malthaussen

(18,575 posts)
25. There is no basis for this in the Constitution...
Wed Nov 6, 2019, 11:49 AM
Nov 2019

... and impeachment is not a legal proceeding. The DoJ is part of the Administrative branch, not the Legislature. In a sane world, this claim would never be dignified.

"If you can't win on the facts, attack the process."

-- Mal

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

? wryter2000 Nov 2019 #1
Great question! Mike 03 Nov 2019 #4
I would think wryter2000 Nov 2019 #6
Trump's "constitutional power to screen privileged information from lawmakers" Mike 03 Nov 2019 #2
in impeachment, absolutely not. the rules are what nancy sez they are. mopinko Nov 2019 #10
SCOTUS already ruled on that during Nixon. No privilege to cover up crimes. lagomorph777 Nov 2019 #26
Does this override the rules set down by the House last week? underpants Nov 2019 #3
THIS! bluestarone Nov 2019 #7
The DOJ seems to be interfering with an investigation sakabatou Nov 2019 #5
Totally agree! Juneboarder Nov 2019 #8
In the long run it can't be and hopefully in the long run those responsible like Barr cstanleytech Nov 2019 #17
Barr is setting himself up for impeachment. lagomorph777 Nov 2019 #27
Trump & Barr & DOJ are inventing powers as time moves along bucolic_frolic Nov 2019 #9
LOL @ trying to get the whistleblower details via this BS? Brainfodder Nov 2019 #11
This will definitely be ignored. The DOJ/executive branch has no power Re: an impeachment process. tableturner Nov 2019 #12
Not necessarily onenote Nov 2019 #19
They don't have to let a DOJ attorney accompany witnesses & force witnesses to listen to them... tableturner Nov 2019 #22
And dis-barr barr, and throw him in jail too. Lock him up. Nov 2019 #13
The attorney general and the DOJ have historically been involved in reviewing and supporting onenote Nov 2019 #20
Somebody is trying to please Corgigal Nov 2019 #14
Nixon did his....... MyOwnPeace Nov 2019 #15
I would assume the witness would also have their own lawyer present. patphil Nov 2019 #16
Republican lawyers making s**t up. Grins Nov 2019 #18
Executive privilege existed and was recognized by the courts long before Nixon onenote Nov 2019 #21
They see how the courts have been ruling lately Bayard Nov 2019 #23
Barr knows he's going down with them. This is the last gasp. nt crickets Nov 2019 #24
There is no basis for this in the Constitution... malthaussen Nov 2019 #25
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»DOJ places new legal barr...»Reply #25