Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

MyOwnPeace

(17,578 posts)

3. Confusing to me also...........

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Wed Nov 6, 2019, 05:15 PM

Nov 2019

I would think the committees would love to have a legal statement letting those that are subpoenaed are required to honor them.
Instead, I'm guessing that this is all "lawyer talk" about how to proceed from here without stopping anything.

That being said, I'd love to hear some DU lawyer provide some insight regarding this!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

House Withdraws Impeachment Subpoena To Ex-NSC Aide [View all] BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 OP

I am concerned about the repercussions Sanity Claws Nov 2019 #1

The court could come down on the side of Executive Privilege.. SallyHemmings Nov 2019 #2

Confusing to me also........... MyOwnPeace Nov 2019 #3

I'm wondering if Mr. Sonderland has served up a hearty plate of AllTheyNeed /nt bucolic_frolic Nov 2019 #4

I'm a DEM but noneof_theabove Nov 2019 #5

I read this somewhere... Dan Nov 2019 #6

The administration's strategy is to run out the clock with delays in court.The DEM's strategy is Nitram Nov 2019 #7