Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(172,608 posts)

7. It was more a whining headline

Reply to jberryhill (Reply #5)

Tue Nov 12, 2019, 05:51 AM

Nov 2019

although technically they can set up one of those web-based audio conferences pretty quickly that could have accommodated them for a "publicly-accessible hearing" but...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge shuts out public from Mick Mulvaney hearing on House impeachment subpoena [View all] BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 OP

Was that a status conference or a hearing? jberryhill Nov 2019 #1

It may have had to do with his motion to piggy-back onto the Bolton/Kupperman case BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #2

dems quit pussyfooting around noneof_theabove Nov 2019 #3

It is my understanding that by disregarding a subpoena they relinquish rights to testify later... IthinkThereforeIAM Nov 2019 #4

Bullshit headline jberryhill Nov 2019 #5

Thank you intrepidity Nov 2019 #6

It was more a whining headline BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #7

Federal courts are fairly particular about how they set up teleconferences jberryhill Nov 2019 #8

I'm sure they are and do BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #9