Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(172,425 posts)
9. I'm sure they are and do
Tue Nov 12, 2019, 11:48 AM
Nov 2019

At the agency I worked for in the federal government, we had a "dedicated" system too that had its own T1 lines run to the various field/Regional offices and HQ (usually installed in some conference room). But because there were so many teleconferences needed and going on between these various agency offices around the country, there were a number of contracts obtained over the years with various vendors like Cisco (WebEx) and others to allow for all types of audio & video teleconferencing to include outside entities. Even Windoze has its own internal Outlook conference call function.

And with respect to this court "moving ahead quickly" - well with Leon having a timeline where things aren't really getting started until December means he isn't exactly operating "quickly"... particularly given the nature of this particular issue. There's no "mucking" necessary with these telecon systems. Schedule the thing, give attendees the number to be called and the conference ID, and they can get connected - even if just audio-only.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge shuts out public fr...»Reply #9