Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(172,649 posts)
Thu Nov 14, 2019, 04:59 PM Nov 2019

GOP senator blocks Dem's effort to push gun bill amid California shooting [View all]

Source: CNN

Washington (CNN)An impromptu effort to pass a gun background check bill in the Senate unanimously was quickly nixed by a Republican senator who said it would infringe on Second Amendment rights, as news of a mass shooting at a California high school came rolling in Thursday morning. Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut requested that the universal background check bill, H.R. 8, be passed by unanimous consent -- a procedural move that allows a bill to skip several steps, including debate, to pass unanimously, without senators casting an individual vote.

"We can't go 24 hours without news of another mass shooting somewhere in America. My kids and millions' others hide in corners of their classroom or in their bathrooms preparing for a mass shooting at their school, and this body does nothing about it," Murphy, who represented the constituents of Newtown in the House of Representatives at the time of the 2012 Sandy Hook elementary school mass shooting, said on the Senate floor just before noon on Thursday. The motion was blocked by Republican Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith of Mississippi, who argued that the bill should not be "exempt from consideration by the appropriate committee of jurisdiction." "Legislation that would affect the rights of American citizens under the Second Amendment should not be fast tracked by the Senate," Hyde-Smith said Thursday.

"If this so-called common sense bipartisan legislation was indeed crafted with strong bipartisan input, it shouldn't have any problems advancing by regular order," she added. "Many questions about this legislation need to be answered before it's forced upon law-abiding gun owners." After Hyde-Smith's action, Murphy said, "I can't get a piece of legislation to the floor in any other way other than to offer this motion," Murphy said, citing the Republican control of the committee. "And the American public are not going to accept silence from this body week after week, month after month, in the face of this epidemic carnage that is happening across this country."

Passed in the US House of Representatives in February, H.R. 8 would require background checks on all firearm sales in the country. Currently, under federal law, only licensed gun dealers must perform background checks for anyone seeking to purchase a firearm, which leaves the sale of guns between individuals largely unregulated.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/14/politics/chris-murphy-cindy-hyde-smith-gun-background-check-bill-california-shooting-trnd/index.html



To be clear - this was a "unanimous consent" motion request to pass the House Background check bill, the motion being a tool that has been used many times in the past, and one that eliminates the need for debate (the Senate usually sets aside 30 hours for debate including discussion about amendments), and an enumerated vote. And of course in this case, someone from the GOP (the loon from MS) swoops in and halts it. All it takes is one objection.
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Bill would have not stopped this horrific deal....ever. AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #1
This is not just addressing this one incident BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #4
EXCEPT...this Bill would have done nothing for "loopholes" like this. AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #6
He's spearheading this bill in general but it doesn't matter who presents it BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #8
This idiot had a handgun... AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #9
Again you are missing the point and purposely fixating on the messenger BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #12
You can't source ONE....not since Columbine....I'm not missing ANY points. AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #15
"I have ZERO problem starting there.. none what so ever." BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #16
I donated to Sen Murphy 3 yrs ago....it has nothing to do with him. AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #18
Your ranting and railing about him and Sandy Hook gives me pause. BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #22
Show me EVER ranting and railing about Sen. Murphy.... AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #23
I rest my case! BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #24
Wise decision.....you couldn't do it.... AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #25
Unless you confiscate...AWB is worthless. AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #11
Many municipalities did gun buybacks BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #14
Not mandatory of course....completely voluntary...and on the City dime. AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #17
You are changing goal posts BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #19
I didn't "change" squat....I just said that Sen. Murphy's bill would do nothing.. AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #20
The "bill" which is the House's bill by the way BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #21
Gun shows DO have background checks for sales.... AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #27
Not for private sales from people who rent a table and set up shop. BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #28
Not true.....that's a widely assumed myth. AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #31
At the very moment I was on the Senate floor making a motion to force a vote on universal background riversedge Nov 2019 #2
So he claimed that if this measure passed, the slaughter would stop. Igel Nov 2019 #5
If the bill saves ONE child, it is worth it to their parents. IMHO. #Onelessgun riversedge Nov 2019 #10
How would it have resulted in 1 less gun.....or saved 1 child today? AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #13
Would have had ZERO bearing on this freakshow...none AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #7
I too pretend my allegations, lacking data to support them, are absolute. LanternWaste Nov 2019 #32
The freak was 16....illegal Federally NOW to posess a handgun. AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #33
Good. Force the Reeps to take the wrong side publicly! ananda Nov 2019 #3
Looks like the only thing... Toorich Nov 2019 #26
Did Sen Murphy think that any gun control measure would get "unanimous consent"? JustABozoOnThisBus Nov 2019 #29
It was the House bill that had already been debated and passed in the House with bipartisan support BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #30
Still wouldn't have stopped the deal......you know that. AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #34
It is designed as a deterrant. And you refuse to acknowledge that. BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #35
Seems like a great place to start ManiacJoe Nov 2019 #36
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»GOP senator blocks Dem's ...