Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(21,493 posts)

14. I call BS on the judges' suggestion they shouldn't be involved - that's the judiciary's job. nt

Mon Nov 18, 2019, 04:52 PM

Nov 2019

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judges suggest court shouldn't solve dispute over Mueller's evidence [View all] swag Nov 2019 OP

then WH must comply, right? Grasswire2 Nov 2019 #1

I think they're implying exactly the opposite stopdiggin Nov 2019 #4

if they don't have any jurisdiction (and I agree about that)... Grasswire2 Nov 2019 #5

they won't be enforced stopdiggin Nov 2019 #10

The question is whether or not this is Congress' job. Igel Nov 2019 #15

So, maybe a steel cage match to decide? DeminPennswoods Nov 2019 #2

I'm reading this as they won't force DoJ to turn over the GJ info... Dennis Donovan Nov 2019 #3

Agree...n/t ewagner Nov 2019 #6

I have scored a major victory DENVERPOPS Nov 2019 #7

"The government is made up of three co-equal branches, any two which serve as a check LastLiberal in PalmSprings Nov 2019 #9

Courts should stop with the bothsiderism neutrality and just enforce the law bucolic_frolic Nov 2019 #11

I'm not a lawyer, but that Trump judge sounds crazy as hell. TryLogic Nov 2019 #12