Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(151,035 posts)
3. This raises all sorts of questions, along with all sorts of potential.
Wed Nov 20, 2019, 09:45 AM
Nov 2019

We're constantly being surveiled. Cameras on homes are the next step. Law enforcement has been using private security camera video to investigate crimes for quite some time now. Now, they'll be using video from residential cameras. I'm not sure what the difference is, really.

Almost daily, here in the Twin Cities of Minnesota, the morning news shows video of some suspect of something in the act of committing a crime or at the scene of a crime. Typically, an arrest soon follows. Why? Because creeps who commit criminal acts usually have pissed off people who know them. Those pissed off people drop a dime and ID the person in the video, and the police go an arrest that person.

The Ring camera on your house or on your neighbor's house is in play now. Several times, recently, burglars and car thieves have been caught quickly in my city because video was available.

Is privacy being invaded? Sure it is. But whose privacy?

Will such video get misused? Probably. Everything gets misused.

Disclaimer: I don't have a camera on my home, and have no plans to put one there. I have neighbors who have installed Ring systems, though. My motion sensor floodlights will help if one of those can see my house and a burglar shows up. We have burglars where I live, from time to time.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why do they not ask the policed to buy their own cams randr Nov 2019 #1
Your idea is to have as MANY POLICE cameras around as doorbells. Think again. Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2019 #10
No, I really do not want more cameras randr Nov 2019 #11
They don't need a warrant because the camera owners consent to share the data with authorities. nt Quackers Nov 2019 #12
Corporate legal rights invoked yet again. ancianita Nov 2019 #2
This raises all sorts of questions, along with all sorts of potential. MineralMan Nov 2019 #3
Nice post - there is a real trade off here karynnj Nov 2019 #5
The entire issue is complicated, and has 4th Amendment links. MineralMan Nov 2019 #6
As you watch your smart tv, it may be watching you Marcuse Nov 2019 #4
Or not. Alexa is listening to you, too...all the time. MineralMan Nov 2019 #7
You are correct. Quackers Nov 2019 #13
Neither does Amazon. Nobody could afford to have people listening. MineralMan Nov 2019 #14
But they did, just usually not in real time. Quackers Nov 2019 #16
Some humans listen to some things. The percentage that is heard by MineralMan Nov 2019 #17
human ears? not necessary with todays tech... getagrip_already Nov 2019 #18
That's not Amazon's decision to make. Mr.Bill Nov 2019 #8
thought about getting one, now, not anymore. nt Javaman Nov 2019 #9
That's OK. Your neighbors will get one. MineralMan Nov 2019 #15
Sounds like the very definition of fascism truthisfreedom Nov 2019 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Police can keep Ring came...»Reply #3