Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
I don't understand this at all (the ruling). What about the overriding concern of conflicts of ... SWBTATTReg Nov 2019 #1
State Constitutional Amendment perhaps Raven123 Nov 2019 #2
Have no details on the rationale but if it was unanimous, then Goodwin Liu agreed. CincyDem Nov 2019 #3
My Opinion On This Is BirdandSquirrel Nov 2019 #4
Exactly. Not surprised at this at all. I thought it was stupid for the governor to push it. You still_one Nov 2019 #7
Supremacy Cause... LovingA2andMI Nov 2019 #5
Legal Basis BirdandSquirrel Nov 2019 #6
What we need is a transparency law over who provides the money to anyone that cstanleytech Nov 2019 #8
We did until Citizens United ... aggiesal Nov 2019 #14
Expected DetroitLegalBeagle Nov 2019 #9
I don't disagree with you - do you anything about that court's discussions ArizonaLib Nov 2019 #12
The requirements are pretty simple DetroitLegalBeagle Nov 2019 #18
Thanks! ArizonaLib Nov 2019 #29
I think we all knew this stood no chance anywhere. BlueTsunami2018 Nov 2019 #10
They would be right in regards to the general election. LiberalFighter Nov 2019 #11
Final presidential candidates need to have security clearance !! TryLogic Nov 2019 #13
Except that the authority for issuing a clearance is the executive. Igel Nov 2019 #28
Apparently there needs to be some sort of structural change. TryLogic Nov 2019 #31
It's a essentially a First Amendment issue djg21 Nov 2019 #15
Here is what the judges decided ... aggiesal Nov 2019 #16
Associate Justice Josh Groban?! n/t TheRickles Nov 2019 #22
That's what it said ... aggiesal Nov 2019 #23
Yes, I was just joking about the similar name. Thanks for this info on the "other" JG. n/t TheRickles Nov 2019 #25
So much for states' rights bucolic_frolic Nov 2019 #17
Vehicle inspections aren't in the Constitution Polybius Nov 2019 #32
Dude, it's the Constitution. The Law of the Land. The Court had no choice in the matter. Nitram Nov 2019 #33
The constitution provides the requirements, not the states Cicada Nov 2019 #19
Trump has been mucking with the 9th OneCrazyDiamond Nov 2019 #20
Supreme Court has ruled on this. Twice. Doormouse Nov 2019 #21
it will probably require an amended constitution to include such a requirement. nt yaesu Nov 2019 #24
Bad News. zentrum Nov 2019 #26
Should have listened to Jerry Brown Jake Stern Nov 2019 #27
Good ruling Polybius Nov 2019 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»California Supreme Court ...»Reply #24