Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mahatmakanejeeves

(70,913 posts)
Thu Nov 21, 2019, 06:32 PM Nov 2019

House says Supreme Court precedents do not shield Trump financial records [View all]

Source: Washington Post

Courts & Law
House says Supreme Court precedents do not shield Trump financial records

By Robert Barnes
November 21, 2019 at 3:34 p.m. EST

There is no precedent for keeping a House committee from examining President Trump’s financial records, lawyers for the House told the Supreme Court on Thursday, and “each day of delay harms Congress by depriving it of important information it needs to carry out its constitutional responsibilities.”

House General Counsel Doug N. Letter said in a brief that the court’s precedents involving Presidents Richard M. Nixon and Bill Clinton make clear that the chief executive enjoys no special privilege to be free from investigation or legal action.

The Supreme Court “has established that even a private citizen may invoke the courts’ subpoena power against the president in appropriate cases,” the brief states. “In light of that settled law, it would hardly make sense to say that Congress, a coordinate branch, cannot use its own subpoena power in a matter involving the president.”
....

But Letter said that if the court agrees to a stay of a lower court’s order telling Trump’s longtime accountants Mazars USA to turn over the records, it should expedite a decision on whether to order a full briefing and a hearing on the case. Letter suggests that the court consider the issue at its private conference Dec. 13.

The case at hand involves a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that said that the House Oversight and Reform Committee may see eight years’ worth of Trump’s personal and business financial records.
....

Robert Barnes has been a Washington Post reporter and editor since 1987. He joined The Post to cover Maryland politics, and he has served in various editing positions, including metropolitan editor and national political editor. He has covered the Supreme Court since November 2006. Follow https://twitter.com/scotusreporter

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/house-says-supreme-court-precedents-do-not-shield-trump-financial-records/2019/11/21/3289fc0e-0c8c-11ea-bd9d-c628fd48b3a0_story.html



Robert Barnes is having a busy afternoon.

House says Supreme Court precedents do not shield Trump financial records


5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House says Supreme Court ...