Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NickB79

(19,233 posts)
12. Our species may survive, but our technologically advanced civilization may not
Tue Dec 10, 2019, 05:17 PM
Dec 2019

Small communities of humans, knocked back to a pre-industrial age, living short brutal lives of constant hunger and tribal warfare, is not the future most of us hope our descendents to live in. It is, however, a real possibility given the risk of global resource wars and social collapse on a hot, crowded planet filled with all manner of horrific weapons controlled by increasingly desperate, nationalist leaders.

While expected, it still gives saidsimplesimon Dec 2019 #1
Same here. For people who care deeply about the environment this recent barrage of Mike 03 Dec 2019 #6
NOAA Arctic Report Card Eugene Dec 2019 #2
Thanks. I think the WaPo will add the link too. From the Associated Press: mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2019 #8
tRump hasn't squelched this report? groundloop Dec 2019 #3
It has been accelerating... Newest Reality Dec 2019 #4
Its concerning but I would hardly called it dreaded. After all both polar regions of the world have cstanleytech Dec 2019 #5
I think those last five words may be what gives some people a wee sense of alarm. Pacifist Patriot Dec 2019 #7
Unless its a drastic change which raises the carbon dioxide levels and or lowers cstanleytech Dec 2019 #9
Our species may survive, but our technologically advanced civilization may not NickB79 Dec 2019 #12
On average, world's oceans have lost 2% of oxygen content since the 1950s; some areas far worse hatrack Dec 2019 #13
You're conflating geological scale w/ human scale. LanternWaste Dec 2019 #10
Deniers will have their day, too. Muriel Dec 2019 #11
It's not climate change jeffreyi Dec 2019 #14
I remember reading an article in Scientific American Haggis for Breakfast Dec 2019 #15
I bet the human population is only 1 billion by 2100. roamer65 Dec 2019 #16
Anti-science head-in-the-sand president will be long remembered as the last man who could have truthisfreedom Dec 2019 #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The Arctic may have cross...»Reply #12