Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

mike_c

(37,040 posts)

3. what she said....

Reply to sabrina 1 (Reply #2)

Thu Jan 12, 2012, 06:49 PM

Jan 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bradley Manning moves step closer to full court martial [View all] alp227 Jan 2012 OP

So, the government sustained all 22 charges. msanthrope Jan 2012 #1

I guess they couldn't get him to lie about Assange. sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #2

what she said.... mike_c Jan 2012 #3

Why are you assuming he would lie? msanthrope Jan 2012 #5

Actually I said the exact opposite of what you wrongfully read into my comment. sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #6

You are suggesting that a plea agreement in which Manning testifies against Assnage would be falsely msanthrope Jan 2012 #11

No, I'm not suggesting any such thing, I'm suggesting the opposite. sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #14

No, you aren't being clear. msanthrope Jan 2012 #17

Why do you think he would even be asked to do that? HE is on trial, not Assange, although sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #19

You didn't answer my question. Nor do I think you will. nt msanthrope Jan 2012 #20

You didn't answer my question, although in a way you did. sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #21

"news publishers" aren't immune from "collusion"? joshcryer Jan 2012 #22

Well, I think Manning left a trail of Assange requests for information. And he can testify to the msanthrope Jan 2012 #32

Thanks for providing those hard hitting facts. joshcryer Jan 2012 #33

I think you fundamentally misapprehend a few things. msanthrope Jan 2012 #29

I don't assume anything. I know the facts so far. sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #30

Did he even testify at this preliminary hearing? I don't recal any news reports that he said 24601 Jan 2012 #7

His lawyer declined to put him on. Smart move. msanthrope Jan 2012 #18

After Eric Holder publicly said that he would look for a crime to charge Assange with, EFerrari Jan 2012 #26

About time they sent him to trial Mudoria Jan 2012 #4

Why are the names of Coombs' witnesses he wants redacted on his own website? (nt) Robb Jan 2012 #8

Why was witness 48 completely redacted??? Was it related to this story--- msanthrope Jan 2012 #12

That is crazy, I smell a mole. joshcryer Jan 2012 #23

It's possible the defense attorney redacted the information. msanthrope Jan 2012 #25

I'm intimately familiar with the Green Scare cases, and we know that basically... joshcryer Jan 2012 #34

did he order the murder of civilians using drones or something similar? nt msongs Jan 2012 #9

No, he committed a worse crime, he exposed the murder of civilians. sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #10

Yep, he pulled back the curtain. nt gateley Jan 2012 #15

They should schedule the trial after.... JJW Jan 2012 #13

Oh, God, that would be so JUST. Sigh. nt gateley Jan 2012 #16

A court martial The Wizard Jan 2012 #24

Couldn't agree more! n/t sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #27

False about the C's-M, of course. PavePusher Jan 2012 #28

Good. nt hack89 Jan 2012 #31