Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

socialindependocrat

(1,372 posts)
39. But blasphemy is in the eye of the beholder....
Sun Sep 23, 2012, 01:51 AM
Sep 2012

many people in the past have been put to death for blasphemy
based on someone's opinion or desire to eliminate opposition.

Martin Luther could have lost his life or freedom for breaking away
from the Catholic church,

The freedom to disagree and start a new religion is basic religious evolution
but could be considered blasphemy.

Who's to say when the line is crossed and who meters out the punishment.

I was talking to a friend from California tonight who said in Cal. people are afraid
to make a statement about anything for fear that they will offend someone and brought
to task. It's a scary way to live, always thinking that you can be ridiculed or punished
for stating a belief or talking about anything - not controversial - just anything.

One of the things I learned here on DU is you develop a thick skin or you get beaten up.
To make a poorly worded statement and stand corrected is part of the learning process.

Putting out a contract to have someone killed is illegal. Saying that someone should be killed because they insult your religious leader is similar.

Thanks again for doing all that work to provide me with the links. I appreciate your efforts.
As Wikipedia says, there is a large bloc for and a large bloc against - as so the discussion goes on.
We also have the tea party and the progressives - and so similar discussions continue.
I go back to my belief that we should be free to choose and when one group tries to force
the other group to follow their beliefs then they are overstepping the bounds.

Look at all the things that people have been called to task for in the past: alcohol, swearing,
dancing, "witchcraft" damned if you do and damned of you don't . It all seems to get bleached
away as time goes on and morals evolve...

Whatever. The discussion continues.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Strangely, some Americans want us to do that too. MNBrewer Sep 2012 #1
I am offended by Pakistanis telling us how our government should treat our people, If they can Vincardog Sep 2012 #2
Prediction: You're offended but won't go on a murderous rampage! Pterodactyl Sep 2012 #38
ALL this murderous rampage is BS. The radical right wing on both sides are dying or more Vincardog Sep 2012 #40
And here I thought ... ArcticFox Sep 2012 #3
Really. zellie Sep 2012 #24
We'll ban blasphemy on the day you ban religion from YOUR government. hobbit709 Sep 2012 #4
yeah thats not gonna happen AlecBGreen Sep 2012 #5
Wait a second here... sdfernando Sep 2012 #6
Yeah, glacierbay Sep 2012 #7
I get the feeling that there are people who wish to louis-t Sep 2012 #8
Sounds similar to... Bosonic Sep 2012 #9
Dear Mr. Alvi: you have the right to not watch or Ilsa Sep 2012 #10
I wish America could contain it's hate speech within America Jessy169 Sep 2012 #11
And just how would you contain hate speech within America? glacierbay Sep 2012 #20
Yes, those poor Australians/Brits/Germans/Indonesians etc all suffering under dysfunctional govts riderinthestorm Sep 2012 #21
Maybe all those people can go ahead and just get off the internet fujiyama Sep 2012 #33
Multiple personalities of the Muslim rage elleng Sep 2012 #12
Maybe a tit for tat would shed light on the situation... socialindependocrat Sep 2012 #13
Did you mean "... and they *don't* circumcise themselves"? muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #31
Oops! Have to think of another trade off.... socialindependocrat Sep 2012 #32
I think their idea (though I don't agree with it) is that blasphemy against any religion muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #35
But blasphemy is in the eye of the beholder.... socialindependocrat Sep 2012 #39
Robert A. Heinlein on blasphemy: Grave Grumbler Sep 2012 #14
bullies of Islam. evidently they have little faith in the validity of their own beliefs nt msongs Sep 2012 #15
"Life sucks, get a fucking helmet!" - Dr. Denis Leary. Edweird Sep 2012 #16
Once again keep your faith to yourself. If you believe in Muhammad, then nothing anyones will do JRLeft Sep 2012 #17
Apparently zellie Sep 2012 #28
how about you just fuck off instead Arif? trouble.smith Sep 2012 #18
Legislate what exactly? mwooldri Sep 2012 #19
...and convert to Islam. L0oniX Sep 2012 #22
They've got to be kidding? defacto7 Sep 2012 #23
Well we expect countries to recognize that we do not ban blasphemy treestar Sep 2012 #25
Please Explain It To Them november3rd Sep 2012 #26
Next up....women wear burqas zellie Sep 2012 #27
We'll change the constitution right away for you, Sir jsr Sep 2012 #29
Inflammatory headline doesn't match the content of the article... Ash_F Sep 2012 #30
Hey Alvi fujiyama Sep 2012 #34
Thank you for your concern, Mr. Alvi, but no Jack Rabbit Sep 2012 #36
They can take their blasphemy law suggestion and stick it... Pterodactyl Sep 2012 #37
Hah! Like that's going to happen. Quantess Sep 2012 #41
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pakistani politician call...»Reply #39