Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pat_k

(12,904 posts)
11. There must be some way to test for the presence of the antibody.
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 11:47 PM
Mar 2020

Two negative tests as confirmation of recovery from the virus should be accompanied by a test for the presence of the antibody.

I think we don't know enough now to know how long immunity generally lasts. I know there was a report about a fairly rapid reinfection in a recovered person, but it's unclear to me how common that is. There may have been reason unique to the person that explains why the antibody didn't "last" in them.

Part of research will be testing recovered for presence of the antibody over the course of many months to determine how long it generally "lasts."

Whatever we know, or learn about how long immunity lasts, and the possibility of it lasting only a short time, must be conveyed to every person deemed "recovered." That should help limit any "invincible" feeling they might walk away with.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It seems to me that those catching it are younger than BigmanPigman Mar 2020 #1
The reports of closures are coming fast and furious. pat_k Mar 2020 #2
I watched Pelosi's news presser this morning BigmanPigman Mar 2020 #3
Go Pelosi! Hope she backs up with legislation to fund efforts beyond CDC. pat_k Mar 2020 #4
THIS! Dem2theMax Mar 2020 #5
So what do we do about the asymptotic people in this country? cstanleytech Mar 2020 #6
Social distancing/good hygiene without isolation still makes a huge impact on flattening the curve. Pobeka Mar 2020 #7
Absolutely! pat_k Mar 2020 #9
True. But if we can do some amount of general "surveillance" testing... pat_k Mar 2020 #8
Everybody stay home Igel Mar 2020 #12
The problem I see with testing.... Bayard Mar 2020 #10
There must be some way to test for the presence of the antibody. pat_k Mar 2020 #11
People are commiting a category error. Igel Mar 2020 #14
Found this article. Not definitive, but most likely testing error or never actually "recovered" pat_k Mar 2020 #16
Great find, useful for understanding more about what might be happening. JudyM Mar 2020 #17
Thanks. I thought it was very useful too. pat_k Mar 2020 #18
If you walk through a room with a mask and it picks up virus that you would otherwise have inhaled JudyM Mar 2020 #19
If the mask doesn't fit, you are still breathing in the aerosol. pat_k Mar 2020 #20
Ok, complete agreement here. JudyM Mar 2020 #21
There's a possible resolution to the claim. Igel Mar 2020 #13
That makes sense Bayard Mar 2020 #15
OMG! "What's that?" Duppers Mar 2020 #22
Not that I don't think this is serious but Linda Ed Mar 2020 #23
In an information vacuum, people jump to their worst fears. pat_k Mar 2020 #24
Kick ck4829 Mar 2020 #25
Thx! pat_k Mar 2020 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Coronavirus: many infecti...»Reply #11