Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
12. That's true both our jobs have had us @ WFH since before our state order and our 2 teens followed
Fri Apr 10, 2020, 05:16 PM
Apr 2020

with job and school closings. Even some service I know like 2 at the airport on hold + at home
but someone I know at fed ex and another friendwho does pharma deliveries everyday ? multiple exposure
And my healthcare family -I just hold in thought because there it can be the viral load exposure they think that can increase severity too
Our teens know other people in service not laid off fast food food shops. I wonder also though what the cut off may be for a younger age protecting a person because it seems like there is one I don’t know but it never went for kids like flu , even in earlier transmission anywhere and even if they are getting it they are not getting sick . No one has a definitive call on that yet but experts suspect it may be down to the unique way children’s immune systems respond to viruses
I’d like to see that study continue too since compromised immune children have passed

Socioeconomics status though looks to have played some role in NYC studies There is still a rush hour in many working class neighborhoods and wealthy are not taking public transportation but yes being rich (or Boris) won’t protect you in the end if you are not isolated
Maybe in a bubble ! 😕

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hundreds of young America...»Reply #12