Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Russia Suspends Use of Genetically Modified Corn [View all]JohnyCanuck
(9,922 posts)67. Scientists Under Attack (when their research shows health related problems with eating GMOs)
The insect-killing, career-ending potato
As a scientist looking at it and actively working on the field, I find that its very, very unfair to use our fellow citizens as guinea pigs. Arpad Pusztai, UKs World in Action TV show
When Dr. Pusztai voiced his concerns about the health risks of genetically modified (GM) foods during a nationally televised interview in August 1998, his was not simply just another voice in a contentious debate. Pusztai was the world leader in his field, and he had received major government funding to come up with the official method for testing the safety of GM foods. His protocols were supposed to become the required tests before any new GMO entered the European market. Pusztai was an insider, and an advocate of GM foodsthat is until he actually ran those tests on supposedly harmless GM potatoes.
The high-tech spuds were engineered to produce their own pesticide. The point of the whole genetic modification experiment was to protect the potato against aphids, which are one of the major pests in Scotland, he said. His team inserted a gene from the snowdrop plant into the potatoes, which did in fact protect the GM crop from the insects.
As part of his safety studies, he fed that insecticide producing GM potato to rats, along with a complete and balanced diet. Another group of rats ate natural potatoes. A third was fed not only the natural potatoes, but they also received a dose of the same insecticide that the GM potato produced. This way, if the insecticide was harmful, he would see the same health problems in both the group that ate the GM potatoes, and those that ate the diet spiked with the insecticide. To his surprise, only those that ate the GM potato had severe problemsin every organ and every system he looked at.
Massive health problems linked to GMOs
After the animals were killed and dissected, Pusztai recalled, we found out that in comparison with the non-genetically modified potatoes, their internal organs developed differently. The intestines and stomach lining, for example, increased in size, the liver and kidneys were smaller, and the overall rate of growth was retarded. And the immune system suffered. Pusztai emphasized, They found in those data 36 36! very highly significant differences between the GM-fed animals and the non-GM fed animals.
snip
After the TV show aired, Pusztai was a hero at his prestigious Rowett Institute, where the director praised his work to the press, calling it world-class research. After two days of high-profile media coverage throughout Europe, however, the director received two phone calls from the UK Prime Ministers Office.
http://www.responsibletechnology.org/posts/?p=1673
As a scientist looking at it and actively working on the field, I find that its very, very unfair to use our fellow citizens as guinea pigs. Arpad Pusztai, UKs World in Action TV show
When Dr. Pusztai voiced his concerns about the health risks of genetically modified (GM) foods during a nationally televised interview in August 1998, his was not simply just another voice in a contentious debate. Pusztai was the world leader in his field, and he had received major government funding to come up with the official method for testing the safety of GM foods. His protocols were supposed to become the required tests before any new GMO entered the European market. Pusztai was an insider, and an advocate of GM foodsthat is until he actually ran those tests on supposedly harmless GM potatoes.
The high-tech spuds were engineered to produce their own pesticide. The point of the whole genetic modification experiment was to protect the potato against aphids, which are one of the major pests in Scotland, he said. His team inserted a gene from the snowdrop plant into the potatoes, which did in fact protect the GM crop from the insects.
As part of his safety studies, he fed that insecticide producing GM potato to rats, along with a complete and balanced diet. Another group of rats ate natural potatoes. A third was fed not only the natural potatoes, but they also received a dose of the same insecticide that the GM potato produced. This way, if the insecticide was harmful, he would see the same health problems in both the group that ate the GM potatoes, and those that ate the diet spiked with the insecticide. To his surprise, only those that ate the GM potato had severe problemsin every organ and every system he looked at.
Massive health problems linked to GMOs
After the animals were killed and dissected, Pusztai recalled, we found out that in comparison with the non-genetically modified potatoes, their internal organs developed differently. The intestines and stomach lining, for example, increased in size, the liver and kidneys were smaller, and the overall rate of growth was retarded. And the immune system suffered. Pusztai emphasized, They found in those data 36 36! very highly significant differences between the GM-fed animals and the non-GM fed animals.
snip
After the TV show aired, Pusztai was a hero at his prestigious Rowett Institute, where the director praised his work to the press, calling it world-class research. After two days of high-profile media coverage throughout Europe, however, the director received two phone calls from the UK Prime Ministers Office.
http://www.responsibletechnology.org/posts/?p=1673
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Maybe after Somalia suspends it, the U.S. MIGHT consider suspending it, too. nt
valerief
Sep 2012
#1
Russia has access to whether corn is GMO, or not? But U.S. citizens purchasing it don't?
Trillo
Sep 2012
#3
Another reason to avoid HF corn syrup, and any food or beverage that contains it
peacebird
Sep 2012
#14
How is this any different than the occasional bad study put out by climate denialists?
evirus
Sep 2012
#15
The luddites alleady "know" that GMOs are teh evil, they are just looking for verification.
Odin2005
Sep 2012
#16
All substances should be proven safe before they are allowed into the environment not
byeya
Sep 2012
#30
That is for scientists to quibble about. I guess we can agree to disagree once again! n/t
AAO
Sep 2012
#49
You don't accept what the scientists say now, so why you would accept something different?
HuckleB
Sep 2012
#62
Monsanto scientists? No I don't trust them. They are paid by Mosanto to produce an outcome.
AAO
Sep 2012
#72
Well if you thnik it's a red herring, then the discussion is over. Agree to disagree...
AAO
Sep 2012
#75
You seem to be jumping from one thing to another without addressing the last points.
HuckleB
Sep 2012
#76
Just out of curiousity what's your reaction to the Stanford organics study?
JackRiddler
Sep 2012
#63
The one where they said that there is no difference between organic and genetically modified food?
darkangel218
Sep 2012
#64
Scientists Under Attack (when their research shows health related problems with eating GMOs)
JohnyCanuck
Sep 2012
#67
Quite an article. GM promoters aren't just anti-science, they're anti-people.
Prometheus Bound
Sep 2012
#80