Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 'Beyond Predatory': Trump Treasury Department Gives Banks Green Light to Seize $1,200 Stimulus Check [View all]duforsure
(11,885 posts)27. What he's doing with this
Is morally and ethically wrong, especially from someone who 's whole career has been stiffing people he's owed money too.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Beyond Predatory': Trump Treasury Department Gives Banks Green Light to Seize $1,200 Stimulus Check [View all]
alwaysinasnit
Apr 2020
OP
If this sort of thing happened to a tRump supporter, I wonder what kind of reaction they would have.
alwaysinasnit
Apr 2020
#2
They better be talking about legal/court-ordered liens or the proverbial shit will hit the fan ...
mr_lebowski
Apr 2020
#3
Oh heck no, please don't apologize. It's important news of national interest, is not a dupe of
progree
Apr 2020
#6
Those that are getting direct deposit risk seizures, while people getting paper checks risk becoming
progree
Apr 2020
#8
A gift to the predatory debt-collection industry, whose Obama-era restrictions were gutted by trump
PSPS
Apr 2020
#9
Gee Whiz - we got the rug pulled out from under us again! Golly, I wish they wouldn't do that.
NBachers
Apr 2020
#13
Can the check still be deposited if one writes the word "F**k" in front of DJT's signature?
tanyev
Apr 2020
#25
Interesting. Does this mean that they can use whichever of the two tax years results in a lower
alwaysinasnit
Apr 2020
#34