Assange to UN: 'It is time for the US to cease its persecution of WikiLeaks'

[sabrina 1]

75. Um, that is not how the law works. On the whims of a prosecutor. You are now completly

back-tracking and claiming that she 'wants to' file charges, but you still cannot answer the question, 'why has she not spoken to Assange, in Sweden which she should have done immediately she was handed this case, then later in London, and again when he offered to return to Sweden in Oct?

Just answer that question please or admit that there is no excuse anymore for her failure to follow the law.

Here is how this case SHOULD have been handled:

1)Prosecutor gets the case, according to her own many lectures on this kind of case, she should immediately have interviewed the witnesses, but most importantly, the main suspect who was right there, offering to speak to her.

2) Had she not failed step one, she should then could have and should have filed charges and arrested him in Sweden. Failing that assuming he had left to go to London by then she should have moved to step 3

3) AFTER filing charges she should have issued a EAW.

Instead she skipped steps 1 and 2 and moved to issuing a warrant which is NOT supposed to be issued unless there are charges filed.

'She has him by the balls'?? Really? Three years later she still has not filed charges. And as more of the evidence is made public, her 'case' is falling apart in front of the whole world, which explains why she never filed charges in the first place.

You are floundering badly here, because the facts are not on your side. But I am happy to keep laying out the facts as long as you continue to back track, distort and/or refuse to answer the very simple question 'Why did the Swedish Prosecutor refuse to speak to Assange in Sweden and in London when there as Nothing standing in the way of her doing so'.

And 'not wanting to give Assange special treatment'?? That is what you have fallen back on now? It is NOT 'special treatment' to follow the law. And if you believe that a crime has been committed, you DO NOT GET PERSONAL, as you are claiming she is doing, and if you do, you should be fired from the case. This is about following the law, which this Prosecutor has failed to do.

You are only making her look worse than she already does, by claiming she refuses to follow the law for petty, personal reasons. I doubt she would appreciate that excuse, as it doesn't help her at all.